tribey
ʎǝlʞuᴉH ʞɔɐS
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2003
- Posts
- 73,117
- Reaction score
- 236,106
- Location
- Queen St & Peter Rd
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Listening to Voss on AA after team selection my impression was Atley will only play if Hartlett doesn't come up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Soccer Notice Image
Champions League - FINAL - PSG v Arsenal ⚽ Europa Semis ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - SEMIS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ FA Cup - Man City Win
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 11
SuperCoach Rd 11 Rd 11 Talk - Trades - VC/C - Pendlebury Comp – Win A Badge - Fight MND Comp Returns ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 11 Rd 11 Talk - Trades - The VC/C Thread
Listening to Voss on AA after team selection my impression was Atley will only play if Hartlett doesn't come up.
I'm glad we picked him up for this exact sort of situation only to not play him because reasons, then.
Found it.
We rank 9th for Shots Per I50
We rank 12th in Goals Per I50
No we picked him up in case every other tall got injured - the opposite of this situation. He can work on his craft and his tank, add another preseason and perhaps force his way into the side next year.
Howard on the other hand could be useful this season but obviously he is still building from his recon and Ken wants to stick to his structure and Jacko is still ahead of Howard for now.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think he sees no point in changing up the AFL's #2 attack and #1 defence just to appease the fans.
It's heartwarming to see so much anger in a changes thread again. Last week and against Essendon I recall there was almost satisfaction with selection night. The melting greatly improves our chance of winning IMO.
From tonight I'm really hoping to see Atley; I'm amongst the many with high hopes that he will be another gem.
and Jacko is still ahead of Howard for now.
Given from your list it looks as though they played two tall forwards and we are playing two tall forwards, and everyone is complaining about that, perhaps he remembers too much.
yer, but who is going to tag Mackenzie if Trengove is not forward?Because Trengove isn't a forward.
Again, 1 mark inside50 in the past 2 months.
No-one is saying "dharrr, I wish we'd drop Trengove for Aaron Young".

Oh right. So he's not fit to be played now (leading the SANFL goalkicking), but he's fit to play if there is an injury.
You had me concerned there.
Carn.
No, we picked him up because we are stupid.No we picked him up in case every other tall got injured
The SANFL is rubbish and leading the goal kicking in it isn't worth that much if that's all you bring. You know where it got the leader from last year? A rookie spot with Port Adelaide because no one else was interested.
Anyway goal kicking is not his issue, it's the other 117 minutes when he doesn't have the ball that are. Modern footy needs all players working their butts off both ways.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Because Trengove isn't a forward.
Again, 1 mark inside50 in the past 2 months.
No-one is saying "dharrr, I wish we'd drop Trengove for Aaron Young".
By what measure?
When you have an enormous gaping hole in your strategy and you have a player carving up in the exact position where you're struggling, you break the glass and bring him into the side. This pigheadedness with the forward structure is legitimately costing us a chance at a flag in 2017.
MANY are saying they wish we would drop two smalls for two talls (Impey Neade or Gary for Howard and Eddy). Many want a different structure. FWIW I am with you, I would send trengove back dropping pittard, and bring in Howard - or just drop Trengove for Howard.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Neade was an out this time last week.
The news of his late inclusion at the game resulted in many an exchanged look of concern.
By Ken's measure. And I reckon only just.
Again I think it is due to Howard still recovering. He was played in the backlines in the SANFL as part of his recovery and has only been moved forward recently, doing very well against perhaps the worst side in SANFL history, and then not much else. If he backed up after the 8 goal haul he would probably be in by now.
No, we picked him up because we are stupid.
And then we upgraded him and gave games to Aidyn Johnson, Jimmy Toumpas and Brendan Ah Chee instead to further confirm our stupidity.
Meanwhile at West Coast; no Nic Nat, no Kennedy, no worries.
Okay so tell me why we recruited him?
No matter what you say from here, the club has ****** up.
Ok, to poke more holes into your position here, you are suggesting Eddy isn't good enough, but Howard is - despite Eddy being by far the best perfoming forward in the SANFL side.
Surely you can see the double standards of your argument here.
I would love either of Howard or Eddy to be in the side fwiw.
I have absolutely no faith that the bolded is true based on past history and the fact that Eddy is currently shitting the Ken Farmer in.
