- Apr 15, 2013
- 4,768
- 9,870
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Have heard the AFL has asked Fremantle and Melbourne to play hardball with each other in order to increase drama.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Langdon and 7 for 3 rates him at pick 32. Melbourne would be stupid not to!
Essendon don't have much to trade, are you even allowed to move your 2nd and 3rd rounders?
If you're not, we'll do a straight swap for Tippa.Not sure.
Would even go after Cam Ellis-Yolmen would cost **** all too
Top 5 picks have more value than the way the points system weights them though.
If you're not, we'll do a straight swap for Tippa.
I was surprised about it to.Doesn't surprise me once again Dodoro ignoring our big/inside mid problem we should be after blokes like Powel Pepper,Crouch brothers etc.
I was surprised about it to.
You guys need inside monsters.
Wonder if the Dees land Tomlinson, if they can also afford Langdon. Might impact.
Melbourne should remember the last time they did a pick swap downgrade (Salem and Dom Tyson to GWS for Josh Kelly)
They would be fools to Do it again for a battler like Langdon.
If they actually do that deal, that whole footy dept needs an intervention.
But its soooo boring, 3 into 7 makes it much more interestingThey'll give up a second round pick, nobody is talking pick downgrade.
But its soooo boring, 3 into 7 makes it much more interesting
Still think it isn't worth it for Langdon. The Dees could do something better with that pick, I am sure of it.
I've been over it a few times but it really comes down to who the D's rate in the draft since it doesnt seem like they'll be doing much more other than bringing in Landgdon and Tomlinson (who costs nothing), unless I'm missing something.Still think it isn't worth it for Langdon. The Dees could do something better with that pick, I am sure of it.
I've been over it a few times but it really comes down to who the D's rate in the draft since it doesnt seem like they'll be doing much more other than bringing in Landgdon and Tomlinson (who costs nothing), unless I'm missing something.
IF the D's rate picks 3-10 per say very evenly, then rate 12-20 very evenly they would be stupid not to do it.
They could get Langdon for what they see as free.
Assuming they either trade 3 to us or to GWS, it comes down to whether they would rather
a) 12,14
b) 7 and 21
Keeping in mind 12,14 and 21 may all be pushed back by Henry/McGuinness bids
There is definitely a chance Melbourne would rather have 7 and 21 rather than 12 and 14.
Dez!
I assume you mean Robertson? He's not top 5 is he? Personally I'd rather Rivers than Robertson anyway and I think Stephens from SA fits what we need 1000 times better anywayWell that seems very fair and reasonable and well argued, so I will leave it at that.
I believe Freo are very keen on a WA prospect who is projected to go inside the top 5, so that makes sense.
I get the funny feeling Josh Jenkins will end up at The Dees for a late/token pick as well, they need another KPF.
I've been over it a few times but it really comes down to who the D's rate in the draft since it doesnt seem like they'll be doing much more other than bringing in Landgdon and Tomlinson (who costs nothing), unless I'm missing something.
IF the D's rate picks 3-10 per say very evenly, then rate 12-20 very evenly they would be stupid not to do it.
They could get Langdon for what they see as free.
Assuming they either trade 3 to us or to GWS, it comes down to whether they would rather
a) 12,14
b) 7 and 21
Keeping in mind 12,14 and 21 may all be pushed back by Henry/McGuinness bids
There is definitely a chance Melbourne would rather have 7 and 21 rather than 12 and 14.
Dez!
I just explained a situation where Melbourne might prefer the 3 into 7 that seemed pretty reasonable. So there would be some reason wouldn’t there.Or Melbourne just keep 2/3 and give Freo 21 for Langdon, it doesn't need to be complicated and there's no reason to involve Melbourne's first pick.
I think if we trade our first it’ll be for 2 firsts. We’ll then take them to the draft. Our second for Langdon and Tomlinson a free agent.I just explained a situation where Melbourne might prefer the 3 into 7 that seemed pretty reasonable. So there would be some reason wouldn’t there.
I’m not saying that would be the deal just disputing that there is no reason to move 4 places down the order in an even draft
Jeez I feel as if Essendon will come in and pinch Langdon
100%, the most likely result should GC get a PP (which is bs as far as I'm concerned) is that you guys just send that pick 3 straight to GWS.I think if we trade our first it’ll be for 2 firsts. We’ll then take them to the draft. Our second for Langdon and Tomlinson a free agent.
Tomlinson is a free agent, it wouldn't affect anything.