I did not see a Hawthorn player who played badly. I thought they all did OK and a few were very good.
Yes there were mistakes, but not constant howlers from any player.
It was, as losses go, one I can accept.
We won the first 1/4 on all but the scoreboard. Bad kicking cost us a 5 goal vs 3 qtr time lead.
I am not sure if Clarko’s plan was to win in the air but McEvoy, Lewis, and Ceglar dominated that first quarter with their contested marks. Marks like those can break up a zone.
When McEvoy went down and then Lewis... we were done. Our plan B vs their plan A was never going to beat Richmond.
I thought we did OK.
Howe, who played with Box Hill, would have been handy as a shadow for Martin. Dusty often puts us to the sword... and he did again.
Richmond are very beatable ... with the current players available.
Timmy Almost is... IMO doing great as the 3rd tall. F@cken finally the Hawks have realised, he is not creative, not a standout talent, but if given a task he excels.
Yes there were mistakes, but not constant howlers from any player.
It was, as losses go, one I can accept.
We won the first 1/4 on all but the scoreboard. Bad kicking cost us a 5 goal vs 3 qtr time lead.
I am not sure if Clarko’s plan was to win in the air but McEvoy, Lewis, and Ceglar dominated that first quarter with their contested marks. Marks like those can break up a zone.
When McEvoy went down and then Lewis... we were done. Our plan B vs their plan A was never going to beat Richmond.
I thought we did OK.
Howe, who played with Box Hill, would have been handy as a shadow for Martin. Dusty often puts us to the sword... and he did again.
Richmond are very beatable ... with the current players available.
Timmy Almost is... IMO doing great as the 3rd tall. F@cken finally the Hawks have realised, he is not creative, not a standout talent, but if given a task he excels.
Last edited: