Traded Josh Dunkley - [Traded with F3 (Melb), F3 to Brisbane for #21, F1, F2, F4 (Geel)]

Remove this Banner Ad

If you don't have the self-discipline not to attack other posters and derail the thread with crap every other time you post, thread bans will be applied.

Mods are not here to babysit.

Reporting bad posts instead of replying to them would also be extremely helpful if you wish to continue posting here.
 
weltschmerz said:
We've set his value pretty clearly as two first rounders.
Click to expand...
What type of first rounders like top 10?
Can't think of many players have ever commanded two first rounders
He's out of contract and although he's been very professional about it all he is obviously not happy there to request a trade two years running
 

Log in to remove this ad.

TheWeapon said:
What type of first rounders like top 10?
Can't think of many players have ever commanded two first rounders
He's out of contract and although he's been very professional about it all he is obviously not happy there to request a trade two years running
Click to expand...
I'd wager ether one top 10 pick, or two 10-20 picks. Taranto was a similar player who went for 12 and 19.
 
TheWeapon said:
What type of first rounders like top 10?
Can't think of many players have ever commanded two first rounders
He's out of contract and although he's been very professional about it all he is obviously not happy there to request a trade two years running
Click to expand...
He asked for a trade in 2020, then again this year that’s not two years running
 
TheWeapon said:
You realise that assuming Brisbane finished top 4 in 2023 and had pick 15 again, 15 in 2022 + 15 in 2023 is equivalent to pick 3 according to the draft calculator
Click to expand...
Yep but draft points are a pretty poor way to value a trade. They’re fine to compare trades but they aren’t a reflection of a players worth. What’s the Taranto trade value him at? We may have sent back pick 39 as well. They asked for 30, 39 and a F3 back.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

mattsmob said:
Does that mean the Cerra trade sets the precedent? I'm very confused on why some trades set precedents and others don't?
Click to expand...

Works both ways. There’s been a few lions fans who have said “we’ve been shafted before, is what it is”.
And whilst that’s true, doesn’t mean it should be relevant for this trade.
 
Josh Dunkley would look good in a suns guernsey


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
adogsfan5 said:
Works both ways. There’s been a few lions fans who have said “we’ve been shafted before, is what it is”.
And whilst that’s true, doesn’t mean it should be relevant for this trade.
Click to expand...
So does that mean the Taranto deal isn't relevant for this trade either?
 
BangyBangy said:
Okey dokey. Because your club was so fair to the Suns with the Jack Martin trade. Pot, Kettle.
Click to expand...
I think Elmer_Judd literally phased out of existence due to this post. Absolutely ethered him.
 
Don’t remember the specifics but I’m pretty sure Lachie Neale was traded for a first and second rounder with a pick upgrade coming back our way. Even Dangerfield was done for a first and second. Don’t think we’ll bite on two first rounders for this one, but I feel like a deal will get done where both clubs feel like they’ve lost. It’s the way of the trade period
 
mattsmob said:
So does that mean the Taranto deal isn't relevant for this trade either?
Click to expand...

It’s only relevant in my opinion if we know what the dogs have requested. We’ve requested two firsts. So it’s natural to compare the market and compare with a similar out of contract player in the exact same trade period. I don’t even think we’ll get the same. I think a pick in the teens + a pick in the early 20s is going to be the one.

I don’t see much point in comparing with a player who shafted the lions years ago.
 
wikinick257 said:
Don’t remember the specifics but I’m pretty sure Lachie Neale was traded for a first and second rounder with a pick upgrade coming back our way. Even Dangerfield was done for a first and second. Don’t think we’ll bite on two first rounders for this one, but I feel like a deal will get done where both clubs feel like they’ve lost. It’s the way of the trade period
Click to expand...

6 and 19, significantly more than 21 and a future 15ish.
 
wikinick257 said:
Don’t remember the specifics but I’m pretty sure Lachie Neale was traded for a first and second rounder with a pick upgrade coming back our way. Even Dangerfield was done for a first and second. Don’t think we’ll bite on two first rounders for this one, but I feel like a deal will get done where both clubs feel like they’ve lost. It’s the way of the trade period
Click to expand...
Yes and he is a tier below these elite players. And he is out of contract. And he is asking to be traded twice in three years.
Yet if they were trying to get a player out of contract from another team there is no way they would entertain 2x 1sts for any player in the league
Hard to be objective when so emotionally involved
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Traded Elijah Hollands [Traded to Carlton with #28 & F4 for #26 and F3(Ess)]
18 19 20 21 22
Replies
533
Views
39K
Maybe Tomorrow
Maybe Tomorrow
TradeDraft
Traded Jack Ginnivan [Traded with #39, F2 & F4 to Hawthorn for #33, F2 & F3]
20 21 22 23 24
Replies
595
Views
30K
Blackhawk42
Blackhawk42
Taylor
Traded Dogs trade #10, #17 and F1 to Gold Coast for #4, #46, #51 and F3
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
142
Views
6K
Caligo
Caligo
Euku
Traded Jack Billings [Traded to Melbourne for F3 (Melb)]
6 7 8 9 10
Replies
228
Views
16K
Lana
Lana
dean33
Traded Ivan Soldo [Traded with #50 to Port Adelaide for #41, #49, F2 and F4]
2 3 4 5
Replies
109
Views
4K
nut
nut
Elmer_Judd
Traded Darcy Tucker - [Traded with Griffin Logue and F3 to North for F2 PP, F3 PP and F4)
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
The Nostradamus
The Nostradamus
MisterMarcus
Traded Port Adelaide trade their 2024 F1 to Fremantle for Pick 22 and 2024 F2
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
Freomaniac
Freomaniac

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top