palmomagpie
Premiership Player
Any news on our reported or potential delistings?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All the points have to come from next year. 88 isn't worth anything in a bid at all. Don't think Pick 88 is consumed in that process either. Doubt we will go into deficit for him.Yes we can. We'll just go into deficit next year. Will only be a small one as Jarman won't go very high i hope. + if he makes it to Pick 70 it will hardly affect us.
We need to delist three. Got to figure spang will go. Webster? Wilsmore?Any news on our reported or potential delistings?
JML, Webster, Willsmore?Any news on our reported or potential delistings?
Did you forget about Hill?Is Shem Tatupu still in calculations for lit management? He is an autodelist. 3 in (TOM, JOM and Vickery) three out, Mitchell Lewis and Tatupu. So we still need to delist 3. My guesses would be Spangher, JML and maybe 1 of Willsmore or Webster.
Although given the happenings of last week, it could be Hodge Burgoyne and Gunston.
If Mitchell and Lewis show strong leadership and play really well, then I dare say we might get picks for more veterans wanting a superanuation pay packet elswhereWell draft day is going to be sh*t for the next 2 years at least, used to love that day and will really miss it and the lead up. With our 3 picks this year I'd use the first pick on the best available as I'm sure there would be a kid slip through that we really liked, the second on a delisted free agent (ruck/mid) and the third on upgrading Stewart.
I have a feeling that we'll definitely take a free agent as our depth has certainly thinned out over the past two off seasons. Both midfielders and rucks will be looked at I imagine. Barlow could be value for 1 year until we get our next gun mid in free agency next year and whist Burton, Lovell and Howe mature further.
Here comes the chaos ball!
Reckon we'll tap a discarded ruckman on the shoulder
Don'tthink anything like that is in affect this year.I thought they could only use the picks for which they had list spots?
I know it's worth nothing. but if He goes late 60's, 70's then we will hardly go into deficit. So it won't effect next years draft much at all.All the points have to come from next year. 88 isn't worth anything in a bid at all. Don't think Pick 88 is consumed in that process either. Doubt we will go into deficit for him.
Collingwood could go into deficit next year because they're only picks with bidding point are: 28(677), 44(362), 51(259), 62(123) & 65(90) = 1511Collingwood have 2. Daicos and can't remember
Pick 88 and upgrade Stewart and Woodward for mine.
We still need to delist 2 more players though.
I think if either Litherland or Spangher get an offer from somewhere we'll delist them to let them get to their club otherwise I think it'll be Willsmore. Webster is also out of contract but I see a bit more in him for some reason.
With pick 88 wouldn't mind going for a mature age player.
LOL yes.Did you forget about Hill?
Willsmore reminds me of Suckling in 2009. Ready to explodeWon't be Willsmore. He will re-sign for two years.
We need to delist three. Got to figure spang will go. Webster? Wilsmore?
I reckon we go for novelty and see if we can pick up Daicos and Jarman.
Anyone else get the feeling this particular article is just taking the p*ss and is almost mocking of us?
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-10-21/better-late-than-never-hawks-hope-to-defy-odds
No, as it's the truth. We are entering the draft with pick 88, where it could be possible that all 17 clubs could be finished with their picks. Pick 88 could very well be lower with all the passes.Anyone else get the feeling this particular article is just taking the p*ss and is almost mocking of us?
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-10-21/better-late-than-never-hawks-hope-to-defy-odds