Playing with Durham.If I was Bancroft I would certainly be pushing my agent to try and tee up a county deal if he makes a ton here and carries his he is putting himself in contention
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Playing with Durham.If I was Bancroft I would certainly be pushing my agent to try and tee up a county deal if he makes a ton here and carries his he is putting himself in contention
There is zero chance Warner misses this Ashes tour. Zero.
He averages 37 from 8 tests in England which is more than most of the players you have listed do in FC cricket....
I'm not apposed to potentially playing around with Warner, at 3,4,5,6. But he's the first picked after Smith.
You need game breakers like Botham, Johnson, Flintoff, Pieterson etc in Ashes series. Warner is one of them, despite his flaky away record in certain regions, he has shown when he hits form in any part of the planet, he destroys sides.
I'll take the low % that he hits that sort of form during this Ashes series vs taking a player in their first couple of tests, because if he does hit that form, we will win the Ashes.
Wow, you're like, so amazing.I said two months ago Bancroft should go to England, glad to see he's proven me right.
I think it’s far more likely the players and selectors will be on Bancroft’s side. Not to say they will leave Warner out so as not to upset Bancroft, just that they’ll tell Warner to keep his trap shut and put up with it. That said, I reckon Bancroft would make a solid number 6.Khawaja despite the last innings against SL is probably the most in the gun.
Despite a couple of examples (UAE mainly), he is the first player to fold like a lawn chair under pressure.
Warner
Bancroft/Harris
Khawaja/Patterson
Smith
Head
Patterson/Bancroft
Paine
Cummins
Starc/Richardson
Lyon
Hazlewood/Richardson
As the most realistic options at the moment. Funnily enough, Bancroft speaking out against Warner might give Harris the running tbh. It's probably more than a little awkward for opening partners having that sort of history with each other.
Just can’t see Harris making the Ashes squad he has no experience in England and opted out of a county deal. Bancroft, Burns and Renshaw will all have 7 FC games in England under their belt by the time the squad is picked. Unless all those blokes fail over there I can’t see them selecting the bloke who isn’t playingMassive statement by Harris after his terrible BBL.
Great to see runs in both innings and that he wasn't affected by the poor decision in the first innings.
Well maybe his 500 or so more runs than Renshaw this season so far will tell a different story. Plus he's pretty much guaranteed a go in the A tour.Just can’t see Harris making the Ashes squad he has no experience in England and opted out of a county deal. Bancroft, Burns and Renshaw will all have 7 FC games in England under their belt by the time the squad is picked. Unless all those blokes fail over there I can’t see them selecting the bloke who isn’t playing
So if that puts him a head of Renshaw how do you justify him over Burns or Bancroft? Opting out of playing county cricket wasn’t a smart move on his part and I do believe if one of those 3 bat well over there they will get the spot in the sideWell maybe his 500 or so more runs than Renshaw this season so far will tell a different story. Plus he's pretty much guaranteed a go in the A tour.
So? Renshaw was the third highest run scorer in the 2018 calendar year and due to lack of form at the start of the year missed selection. So hypothetically lets say Renshaw continues his run of poor form in England that rules him out but what if Banger and Burns are both making big runs in English conditions would you expect someone to get picked of the back of what they did for Victoria 5-9 months earlier over them?.... Guaranteed spot in the squad. He is the current leading run scorer in FC cricket this season.
Well incumbancy over Bancroft, and averaging more in test cricket, whilst also having 160 more runs than Burns and averaging 35.5 more in Shield cricket. Are you seriously saying that a 26 year old that is looking likely to have a 1000+ run season (which hasn't happened since the 14/15 season) is unlikely to go on an overseas tour where we haven't won since 2001?So if that puts him a head of Renshaw how do you justify him over Burns or Bancroft? Opting out of playing county cricket wasn’t a smart move on his part and I do believe if one of those 3 bat well over there they will get the spot in the side