omarlittle1
Club Legend
Batsmen:
1. Warner
2. Harris
3. Khawaja
4. Head
5. Patterson
6. Pucovski
7. Stoinis
8. Labusausage
9. Paine
10. Cummins
11. Richardson
12. Hazlewood
13. Starc
14. Pattinson
15. Lyon
Smith?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Batsmen:
1. Warner
2. Harris
3. Khawaja
4. Head
5. Patterson
6. Pucovski
7. Stoinis
8. Labusausage
9. Paine
10. Cummins
11. Richardson
12. Hazlewood
13. Starc
14. Pattinson
15. Lyon
Smith?
And some may be playing county championship for a couple of months before the Ashes too.We still have 4 rounds of sheild cricket so anyone who makes runs or get's wickets still could be a chance
Head won't miss out, Warner won't either.And some may be playing county championship for a couple of months before the Ashes too.
The only players I have in the squad for sure are:
Smith, Cummins, Hazelwood, Lyon.
Khawaja, Paine and Harris probables.
Everything else is wide open.
Agree, selectors will pick both regardless. Warner I should have in my probables.Head won't miss out, Warner won't either.
We still have 4 rounds of sheild cricket so anyone who makes runs or get's wickets still could be a chance
Do we need one all rounder for England, let alone two? Given the pitches there, I don't think bowling teams out is going to be the problem. I don't think MMarsh or Stoinis have done enough to be on the plane. And as much as I'm happy for Australians to make runs, I'm disappointed that our final Test hit-out is against such weak opposition as it creates a false sense of confidence in guys like Labuschagne and Head, who I don't have any confidence in for English conditions. I would be taking:
Batsmen
Harris
Warner
Khawaja
Smith
Head
Patterson
* Labuschagne
* Renshaw/Bancroft
*Pucovski
Paine
Starc
Cummins
Hazlwewood
Lyon
*Richardson
* Siddle/Worrall/Pattinson
the 17 man squad was more when we played a 6 test series though.
in saying that i think you'll find we took 18 on the last tour, but generally its 16 to england for a 5 test series.
i've always wondered if there are rules of how many can be selected as the touring teams here - india had 18 initially and still flew in agarwal.
I reckon 17 will go.
Bats: Harris, Warner (ugh), Khawaja, Smith, Patterson, Head, Pucovski, Labuschagne
Keepers: Paine, Carey
Bowlers: Starc, Hazlewood, Cummins, Richardson, Tremain (fingers crossed), Lyon, Holland
Harris
Warner
Khawaja
Smith
Labuschagne
Head
Paine (c +)
Cummins
Starc
Lyon
Hazlewood
I know everyone will jump on the Starc selection but he's the only bowler of the "big three" that swings the thing.
So we forfeit the Ashes on the basis we have insufficient batsmen to take to England?I hope the selectors aren’t basing the ashes squad on the performance of the SL tests. All of our struggling/dropped batsmen from the India tests would likely have done well against that bowling attack. The SL test result needs to be taken with a grain of salt.
Harris, Head, Labushka and Patterson would have been lucky to get to double figures if they were playing against India on that Gabba pitch. Let’s face it...Australia do not have the quality or depth to beat good teams at the moment...even with Smith and Warner back in the team. England in England
We still have 4 rounds of sheild cricket so anyone who makes runs or get's wickets still could be a chance
They wont go back to Shaun Marsh at his age now.Instead of picking a squad of 17, i picked the australia vs australia a teams that will be used as the warm up game before the ashes.
Warner
Harris
Khawaja
Smith
Labuschagne
Head
Paine
Cummins
Richardson
Lyon
Hazlewood
Renshaw
Burns
Patterson
Maxwell
Handscomb/Bancroft/ Wade( playing for b/u w/k)
Pucovski
Stoinis
Starc
Pattinson
Tremain
Holland
Have left out Both Marsh boys, siddle and Finch as i think there are better option available. Although there is a high chance S Marsh will be there.
Bancroft’s a pretty tidy keeper, if he has good Shield form, I could see him going with a view to filling in in event of an emergency. If Paine actually went down long term, they would simply fly someone in. I don’t think we need a back-up keeper in this day and age but we definitely need to stock up on our bats.There is no way Handscomb or Bancroft can be seriously considered for a back up keeper. The only way they should keep in tests is if they're in the side and Paine goes down in the middle of a match.
One can only hope.They wont go back to Shaun Marsh at his age now.
Bancroft is okay, but there are much better keepers in the country. I don't the Ashes will be lost if they pick Carey over Bancroft but the reverse? Could well be the case.Bancroft’s a pretty tidy keeper, if he has good Shield form, I could see him going with a view to filling in in event of an emergency. If Paine actually went down long term, they would simply fly someone in. I don’t think we need a back-up keeper in this day and age but we definitely need to stock up on our bats.
So we forfeit the Ashes on the basis we have insufficient batsmen to take to England?