- Apr 15, 2013
- 4,768
- 9,870
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Lobb wants out. He wants to head back to WA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lobb wants out. He wants to head back to WA.
Any word on if he has a preference? Both teams would be very interested in him I'd imagineLobb wants out. He wants to head back to WA.
Any word on if he has a preference? Both teams would be very interested in him I'd imagine
Yes I'd imagine so.Both teams want him.
Damn.Fourth year in a row this rumour has come out.
I expect Lobb to sign a new deal any day now.
My Himmelberg prediction will still occur I have no doubts.Damn.
I had Tomlinson next thread in the sweep.
Sam Reid will be delisted and re-drafted at least another two times before his career is over.I don't know how I managed to draw Sam Reid again.
Lobb's future is as a ruck, it's what he wants rlto do. He will end the season as our primary ruck.
Fourth year in a row this rumour has come out.
I expect Lobb to sign a new deal any day now.
Dont know where you read that. Yes he will be our number 1 ruck ongoing unless something radical happens.I recall reading Lobb doesn't like to ruck full time!
So is he or isn't he # 1 ruck potential?
Is there any indication that Lycett wants to go to GWS?Just a thought bubble.
Lycett to the Giants via free agency.
Lobb to the West Coast for the compo pick.
Lobb rucks as number 1 in 2019 and reverts to ruck/forward when Nic Nat comes back in 2020.
Or that Lobb wants to go to WC? Have no problem with Lycett but Lobb is our best contested mark and we wont be kicking him out.Is there any indication that Lycett wants to go to GWS?
Tell that to the guy who floated the trade.Or that Lobb wants to go to WC? Have no problem with Lycett but Lobb is our best contested mark and we wont be kicking him out.
It wouldn't have fit given it was a response to your post. I think both sides lose on that deal though.Tell that to the guy who floated the trade.
It's not a response to my post in any relevant sense.It wouldn't have fit given it was a response to your post. I think both sides lose on that deal though.
Yep, it is a valid response. In a forum you don't get to decide what responses you receive.It's not a response to my post in any relevant sense.
I addressed the question of Lycett to GWS by pointing out he's a free agent who's been linked to Port and St Kilda.
Your "response" is about Lobb?