Fiiine, i guess it's the smart thing to do.You could have cropped to just the mo
(nb. you can edit your post anytime later)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fiiine, i guess it's the smart thing to do.You could have cropped to just the mo
(nb. you can edit your post anytime later)
Fiiine, i guess it's the smart thing to do.
Rucci "what was wrong with Impey"
Ken "what do you mean"
Rucci "he couldn't finish the game"
Ken "he was fine..... mumble mumble, he was s**t"
Rucci "oh"
You have it sorted mate, few too may frothies for me tonight. Let the Mo live on!You could have cropped to just the mo
(nb. you can edit your post anytime later)
This. This indeed. However, class will mostly win in the end.Good win but I felt that we played fairly poorly and never at any stage got our running game going. Sloane was epic, the spiritual leader of our club. Port did a very good job of dragging us down to their level, so you have to give them their due. Jenkins is needed with gov out for at least a month. We are lacking pace and skills in the backline and Cheney and Doedee need to come in for Kelly and Otten imo. Ryder will get 2 to 3 for his coward punch. Weak effort by him.
Hmm, looks like erm,...... a sausage and potatos
Bought one of those children's books where they put the kids name and home address in the story. They showed an aerial shot of a disused AAMI stadium as their picture of AdelaideBrad Johnson: "The Crows another big win in a Showdown at AAMI Stadium."
Victorians...
Hmm, looks like erm,...... a sausage and potatos
You should send it to Brad Johnson.Bought one of those children's books where they put the kids name and home address in the story. They showed an aerial shot of a disused AAMI stadium as their picture of Adelaide
He's one of their main driversKen thought he played with conviction...
Again Port have played out of their skin in a showdown. Credit to them for being able to do that most times they play a showdown. But that is the best they've got, and we were pretty ordinary for parts of the game. Our upside is huge, bloody huge.Credit where due...Pear played better than I thought possible.
Still should have won by a lot more...goes for all three games so far. I reckon there is a fair bit of improvement left in our Crows.
Except it literally has my address in it.You should send it to Brad Johnson.
Are you ever embarrassed when you read these posts and compare them to reality?
The fact that we didn't get our running game going might be seen as a plus since we still pulled out the win. Showing that we're not a one trick pony with these hard wins, and makes us all the more dangerous.Good win but I felt that we played fairly poorly and never at any stage got our running game going. Sloane was epic, the spiritual leader of our club. Port did a very good job of dragging us down to their level, so you have to give them their due. Jenkins is needed with gov out for at least a month. We are lacking pace and skills in the backline and Cheney and Doedee need to come in for Kelly and Otten imo. Ryder will get 2 to 3 for his coward punch. Weak effort by him.
Assumption from the commentators was they might have bumped heads when Knight ran past, Ryder thought it was a deliberate hit, rather than an accidental clash and then responded in the way he did.Couple of weird things at the end:
- Ryder and Knight have a head clash? Ryder then kinda shoves and hits knight to the ground? What? Why? Pretty much the free + goal is enough penalty. Strange.
Your validation? Nah I just like pointing out you know s**t. Remember before the game you said you'd play Otten in the forward line and defence and I said nah, he will stay up forward. Remember when I said you wouldn't be able to cope with our contested marking up forward? Well I was right on both counts.Nope. I stand by every single word. I said you could win, and yes, I am surprised, because I didn't expect you to be so committed to the contest. And guess what? I'm not in the least bit concerned.
All it means is we are 2-1 now having lost to a side that played better than us on the night by taking their chances when they needed to. I don't need your validation the way you seem to need mine
No he didn't . Gave Sloane 3, wines 2, crouch 1Ginever gives Wines BOG, seriously? He was a star early but Sloane played 4 quarters of quality.
Nope. I stand by every single word. I said you could win, and yes, I am surprised, because I didn't expect you to be so committed to the contest. And guess what? I'm not in the least bit concerned.
All it means is we are 2-1 now having lost to a side that played better than us on the night by taking their chances when they needed to. I don't need your validation the way you seem to need mine
No he didn'tNo he didn't . Gave Sloane 3, wines 2, crouch 1
The fact that we didn't get our running game going might be seen as a plus since we still pulled out the win. Showing that we're not a one trick pony with these hard wins, and makes us all the more dangerous.
Assumption from the commentators was they might have bumped heads when Knight ran past, Ryder thought it was a deliberate hit, rather than an accidental clash and then responded in the way he did.
Where did u get your info from? Said on AA he gave Sloane 3.No he didn't
Your validation? Nah I just like pointing out you know s**t. Remember before the game you said you'd play Otten in the forward line and defence and I said nah, he will stay up forward. Remember when I said you wouldn't be able to cope with our contested marking up forward? Well I was right on both counts.
Can you name one thing you got right pregame?
By the way, did you see Charlie burn off SPP? SPP couldn't lay a glove on him, wasn't SPP supposed to take him out?
You talked such a big game for Port, and Port played out of their skin as they usually do in showdowns. They still weren't good enough to beat the Crows who had an average game by our standard. All that huffity puff puffity is just that. Sad really.Nope. I stand by every single word. I said you could win, and yes, I am surprised, because I didn't expect you to be so committed to the contest. And guess what? I'm not in the least bit concerned.
All it means is we are 2-1 now having lost to a side that played better than us on the night by taking their chances when they needed to. I don't need your validation the way you seem to need mine