Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah - saved one league for my revenge - mwahahaha
See you in the GF of Ruby's Boobies
Wasn't a bad ol hit. Don't think he's going to be missing any games though.
That Brayshaw though, never lived up to the lofty heights expected of him!
I've missed the incidentLOL Way to down play Sloane's eye socket injury.
View attachment 724999
Kudos for putting on a brave face, but his injury has all but assured that Adelaide won't be playing finals and that "Carlton won the trade". No point on even risking him for 2 essentially dead rubbers.
What's really amazing is that I've climbed to 367th overall despite starting with Brayshaw @ M3. How embarrassing would it be for you if he arses a 120+ on Friday night as my Mid E and I loop his score and that is the score that gets me over the line?
What the hell happened ? That's 600 a round give or take.Lol
Ranked 133 just 3 weeks ago
Now ranked 1800
I fking hate this game
I've missed the incident
Is sloanne out for a few weeks?
No donuts at allWhat the hell happened ? That's 600 a round give or take.
You running a donut shop ?
There’s definitely a glitch there, it says you’ve got trades.View attachment 725051
Not sure why it says 6/6 league wins. I’ve already been eliminated in all of them, lol.
Why do they even cap @ 3300 in the first place? And who dafaq came up with THAT magic number??Thanks for shining a light on how much of a dumpster fire CD are.
Hilarious they start scaling in-game whilst the game is still going - which is something that should only be done post-game. It means the scaled points handed to a player of the winning team (like Treloar) results in there being less points to distribute to other players that score from that point onwards in the game.
Would that therefore mean due to there being less points, a player who commits the same effective act as one prior in the game is given less points for it? Is this where their subjective 'weighting' comes into it. Just mind boggling. Keep it linear across the entire game, and if there are points left over, scale post-game. Simple, really.
This has always been my main gripe too. It's even worse than a cap though, it's a minimum as well. That means that players in a high class skilful game get their scores scaled down to fit into the 3300 total while players in an error-ridden mess of a game have their scores scaled up resulting in players who performed better in a skilful game getting less points than those who were just the best of a bad lot in the crap game.Why do they even cap @ 3300 in the first place? And who dafaq came up with THAT magic number??
Matt Crouch smashed him across the head with a forearm. Commentators said if it was an opponent would have got multiple weeks. What a crab Crouch is. I hate him even more now.