Art Vandelay_
TheBrownDog
- Oct 28, 2012
- 105,255
- 144,070
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Bushrangers - Tottenham
and mute. Sky with another Broad love in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
A ball hitting the ground before the fielder has full control over it/their movement.
I'm sure everyone on here is being consistent with their views and insisting that Stokes catch should've been out, just like they were with the Starc one...
I love that Root has no idea what's happening
Even stokes doesn't think he caught it
No, we are simply accepting the precedent set by the Starc decision.And this is where every Australian on here will say “that should be out”? Just like Starc. Right?
Are they two correct decisions, or two incorrect ones?
Could be rain after lunch.
146 to get.
Might lose a whole session. Touch and go
Starc controlled it, did you want him to face plant on the grass and sue you Poms???A ball hitting the ground before the fielder has full control over it/their movement.
Starc controlled it, did you want him to face plant on the grass and sue you Poms???
Well it should have been out. Except butterfingers drops the ball…I'm sure everyone on here is being consistent with their views and insisting that Stokes catch should've been out, just like they were with the Starc one...
Sorry, along with the Spirit of Cricket, you don't get to lecture us about hypocrisy either.I don't think it was out. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy of the clueless individuals on here who were insisting the Starc catch was legal.
Think it was on his chin technicallyVomit on his sweater already.
I don't think it was out. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy of the clueless individuals on here who were insisting the Starc catch was legal.
I agreed with you at the time with the Starc one, so yep!I'm sure everyone on here is being consistent with their views and insisting that Stokes catch should've been out, just like they were with the Starc one...
Biggest umpire rant I've seen since Ponting in the 2010/11 Boxing Day Test.The review was just about the funniest thing I've ever seen, but pretty disgusting scenes from England after that.
When was the last time you saw Australian players, or any for that matter, get in the face of the umpires like that?
That's just so not on, and not to mention, the umpires have done absolutely nothing wrong.
I don't think it was out. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy of the clueless individuals on here who were insisting the Starc catch was legal.
I swear Healy has genuine brain damage.
CTE for sure.
Sure doesn’t sound like the spirit of cricket there..He was gutted, and got peer pressured into it. His body language was the decision really
Maybe mint…,I think the ball might have had too much lacquer on it.
Genuinely no idea why England would review that. Was clear as day.The review was just about the funniest thing I've ever seen, but pretty disgusting scenes from England after that.
When was the last time you saw Australian players, or any for that matter, get in the face of the umpires like that?
That's just so not on, and not to mention, the umpires have done absolutely nothing wrong.