Yeah i don’t like that prictorian is better.Victard lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Gold Coast v Geelong - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Cats at 60% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 10
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Yeah i don’t like that prictorian is better.Victard lol.
[
Nope.
If AFL didnt impose equalisation policies, football department spending caps, player salary caps etc.
It just becomes an arms race and $$ rule.
Clubs like Collingwood and West Coast would be much stronger and the snaller clubs like North and Port would not be able to compete.
So does Hawthorn's 1991 flag have an asterisk too? Or like most people have you forgotten about it not being played there and it just counts as a flag
Holds Collingwood back, surely you jest.
What??And this is a problem why? The league is about money yes? If the league is about money how many years need to tick by before the clubs say it has to be about money.
More chance that 10 clubs remain in Victoria than the league deciding to rotate the GF.There is no chance that in 20 years there will be 10 clubs in Victoria. Any person that thinks there will be has lost their touch with reality.
The WA wowsers are a rare breed.Big clubs are hampered by soft cap limits. I don't know how you would argue with this - it's the whole point of equalisation.
There is no asterisk against any of them. It's garbageWhat about the 1945 grand final played at princes park, have you just forgotten about that like everyone else?
But seriously as for the 91 grand final, Well I was 8 at the time. So yes I have forgotten about it. It doesn't take the asterisk away though. No. Just because I don't remember something. That's a silly yard stick to live by.
Only Victorians benefit from the GF being at the MCG.A few of them sure.
But teams like North, StK and the Dogs play just as few games at the G as WC.
Having a GF at a venue that holds 100k people ensures the most fans get a chan e to watch a GF live if their team makes it.
It is a much better option than rotating. If you rotate and it could be the GABBA's turn the next time WC make it. So less than 10k SC members get a ticket, and even further to travel!!
What a win for the club members that is.
You are an example of a Victorian that likes the advantages Victorian clubs have and don't want things to change.
So each Geelong player would be perfectly happy at Geelong if you lobbed 10% off their contracts? Would none of them consider leaving for more money?
There is no asterisk against any of them. It's garbage
Absolutely a rort for the AFL and how stupid if Freo and WC have to play in a GF.
You never know one must be prepared.Don't think you have to worry about that any time soon
Just popped in to make this point.Imagine the carry on from you lot this week if Charlie Cameron or Zak Butters played for a big Melbourne club.
ViCBIaS!1
That is literally not possible...Only Victorians benefit from the GF being at the MCG.
Westaussies cannot afford to fly over, stay in accommodation for a few days and fly back.
Pay for tickets, if they can secure them off the MCÇ and MCG members who flog them of to the highest bidder.
Absolutely a rort for the AFL and how stupid if Freo and WC have to play in a GF.
In a rotational GF the likelihood is the game is still on the other side of the continent - 16 of 18 and soon to be 17 of 19 sides are east of the nullarbor.Only Victorians benefit from the GF being at the MCG.
Westaussies cannot afford to fly over, stay in accommodation for a few days and fly back.
Pay for tickets, if they can secure them off the MCÇ and MCG members who flog them of to the highest bidder.
Absolutely a rort for the AFL and how stupid if Freo and WC have to play in a GF.
Why not?That is literally not possible...
Just like most of the WA wowser VICBias ranting...all based on crapThat is literally not possible...
Nawww, not that difficult. Whoever are the minor premiers, that is where the GF is played.In a rotational GF the likelihood is the game is still on the other side of the continent - 16 of 18 and soon to be 17 of 19 sides are east of the nullarbor.
West Aussie based club members will get access to less tickets and still can't afford to fly over, stay in accomodation for a GF in Vic, NSW, SA and QLD.
The West Aussie club member position is it is hard for us, so I want to make it s**t for all other club members to try and make it "fair".
Argue for the higher ranked club hosts the GF, but arguing to rotate is a nonsense that will make it a worse position for almost all club members unless that random alignment where the GF is in WA and a WA team makes it.
Nice intelligent answer there DG.Just like most of the WA wowser VICBias ranting...all based on crap
Hodge, Pendlebury, Cotchin, Dangerfield.Just popped in to make this point.
How many VICBIas players have escaped suspension because they're supposedly a good bloke... Kinda makes you think that the whole VICBias thing might be... well... made up...
MCC tickets are non-transferrable for the GF. You need to scan in using your membership card and they do spot checks on the day to make sure people don't hand off their card card to someone else.Why not?