Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy 8 point win vs North

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

5-5
3-2
0-4
4-0
0-3
2-0
0-1
1-0
Cox on the left. FMD!
I reckon Cox would have gone:
LDU 5
Heeney 4
Sheezel 3
Blakey 2
Mills 1.

Which means Clarko has gone for all NM players. That is making a complete travesty of this award and should be called out. I mean Parker, seriously? I haven't read his name once in the post match reviews.
 
So it’s 23 votes to 7.

With the winning team collecting the 7.

Cox was REALLY pis*ed off with our performance.
North 5th in coaches votes despite being 12th on the ladder. Clarko, or whoever does the Norf votes, is giving disproportionate votes to their players

1778485891635.webp
 
I reckon Cox would have gone:
LDU 5
Heeney 4
Sheezel 3
Blakey 2
Mills 1.

Which means Clarko has gone for all NM players. That is making a complete travesty of this award and should be called out. I mean Parker, seriously? I haven't read his name once in the post match reviews.
Adam Simpson admitted on radio once that when coaches are asked to give their votes, they'll often treat it as a throw-away thing after the match, as they're not really concentrating on it due to the other stuff they have on their plate post-match.

I've found it hard to put much stock in them since finding that out.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Did Clarko do both set so votes ? We just voted for 2 north players getting cheap kicks

Parkers gone from bombing it in our midfield to bombing under no pressure in defence and making it someone else’s problem for north , 4 votes
 
Last edited:
Which means Clarko has gone for all NM players. That is making a complete travesty of this award and should be called out. I mean Parker, seriously? I haven't read his name once in the post match reviews.


Parker 29 disposals (3rd overall), 625m gained (1st), 10 marks, 3 tackles. Fair effort from halfback.

The Essendon-GWS game is the one where there was a complete divergence between the two coaches. Maybe a bit of feeling after GWS's smartarse banner.
 
If anyone is interested here is the post game recap after our win vs North




Interesting cox mentioning the fancy shit at half time .

Hope Chad and Paps hear that

I do like stressing enjoy the wins but not be satisfied .
 
Parker 29 disposals (3rd overall), 625m gained (1st), 10 marks, 3 tackles. Fair effort from halfback.

The Essendon-GWS game is the one where there was a complete divergence between the two coaches. Maybe a bit of feeling after GWS's smartarse banner.
Yep
 
It wasn't a good game by the top team.
He'll take it like a dropped game, content that we dodged a bullet & got the points by good luck.
No reason to be generous with his votes knowing the very opposition players that got away from us.

Very fortunate.
The only way to make amends is to get back on track this week against Pies.
Now had we had an easy win against the Roos, I feel that this week against the Pies would have been that danger game that we would drop by not being switched on enough.
I'm sure the axe will be swung this week. Who will cop it?

this is pretty much how i look at our form week to week, too ...
i expect we'll bounce back pretty hard this week
 
Parker 29 disposals (3rd overall), 625m gained (1st), 10 marks, 3 tackles. Fair effort from halfback.

The Essendon-GWS game is the one where there was a complete divergence between the two coaches. Maybe a bit of feeling after GWS's smartarse banner.

20% of his disposals were kickins. 80% of his disposals were uncontested. No clearances.

Basically sat in the backline and collected a lot of easy disposals.
 
I find it hard to believe any coach could watch that game and not have Heeney in their top five players on the ground. I gave my five votes to Blakey over Heeney, but I imagine coaches have different attitudes towards those half-back flankers, depending on who is trying to stop them getting space. But Heeney literally did it all out there.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I find it hard to believe any coach could watch that game and not have Heeney in their top five players on the ground. I gave my five votes to Blakey over Heeney, but I imagine coaches have different attitudes towards those half-back flankers, depending on who is trying to stop them getting space. But Heeney literally did it all out there.
But Clarko gave a vote to the bloke who was tagging him, but nothing to Heeney! It's frankly outrageous.
 
Adam Simpson admitted on radio once that when coaches are asked to give their votes, they'll often treat it as a throw-away thing after the match, as they're not really concentrating on it due to the other stuff they have on their plate post-match.

I've found it hard to put much stock in them since finding that out.
I’m actually surprised the head coach does the votes at all
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Well the other coaches can't vote or else each club's B&F would be spoiled.
Doesn’t the head coach also vote in the b and f?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom