- Aug 9, 2019
- 32,332
- 56,141
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels, Central Augusta
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no your counter argument is fully cooked and done and found very wanting
The issue is the letter apparently shows someone lied to congress
yes did you?did you actually READ the letter?
you totally missed the point - he has denied that the NIH funded gain of function research - that has been proven to be a lie by its own deputy director - in paragraph 4 of that very same letter
no, its been spelled out very clearly - you choose to ignore it because it backs up what I am sayingThe issue is the letter apparently shows someone lied to congress
However he has been unable to explain why or how.
how many different ways do you need the same answer spelled out like it has been. its like there is a missing link in your head that can't admit..crow till I die is right despite the fact he has spelled it outI assume this is some strategy to avoid actually answering the question.
why are you avoiding it ? It's like you don't really understand what the letter says ?
So clearly you can't explain it?no, its been spelled out very clearly - you choose to ignore it because it backs up what I am saying
You've cut and pasted the same article 3 times, provided no context or explanationhow many different ways do you need the same answer spelled out like it has been. its like there is a missing link in your head that can't admit..crow till I die is right despite the fact he has spelled it out
Its actually quite funny that you and others on here are digging down when its in black and white for anyone to see that a gain of function was undertaken and its like the penny just has not sunk in..but when it does for you it will be enlightening
it is - you are just a bit behind in the understanding - it was simply spelled out but maybe I am expecting too muchSo clearly you can't explain it?
The Victorian Ombudsman has lambasted the state’s controversial travel permit system as “inhumane”.
In a report tabled in parliament on Tuesday, Ombudsman Deborah Glass slammed the program as “inhumane” and a “bureaucratic nightmare” that left Victorians shut out of the state.
Victoria’s border crossing permit system was first introduced in January 2021 to prevent incursions of Covid-19 from other states and territories with active community transmission.
In July, thousands of Victorians were shut out of the state when hard border closures banned anyone from “red zones” returning home without an exemption.
The Ombudsman’s investigation, launched in September, found that of the 33,252 exemption applications received between July 9 and September 14, just 2736, or eight per cent, were granted.
Up to 1000 applications were being processed daily, with staff given on average 30 seconds to categorise and prioritise applications.
Some found themselves facing effective homelessness because they lived in Victoria and could not return.
“People’s anguish when they spoke to us was palpable,” Ms Glass said.
“While we did not review all decisions and I do not suggest that all were unfair, the overwhelming majority of applications did not get to a decision-maker at all, and the guidance did not change even as case numbers in Victoria grew and the risks evolved.
yes you certainly are...eventually you'll dig that hole to ChinaYou've cut and pasted the same article 3 times, provided no context or explanation
So I'll stick with one way, which we are still waiting for.
yes you certainly are...eventually you'll dig that hole to China
it is - you are just a bit behind in the understanding - it was simply spelled out but maybe I am expecting too much
But only one is wrong and it's not CTID.What are you guys even arguing over Fauci?
All I see is circle work saying the other is wrong...
not quite Kane - one of us has put up direct letters, and articles supporting their position, the other - CAP - has, well..yeah nahWhat are you guys even arguing over Fauci?
All I see is circle work saying the other is wrong...
Well that didn't answer what they are even arguing... may be I should not even bother.But only one is wrong and it's not CTID.
but it is obvious to anyone with a base level IQ or higher..I mean, cmon man, you were taught to read I assumeYet hear we are waiting for you to explain it.
You expecting to much?
In all the posts you've made telling us all how obvious it is and how you spelled it out
You could have either reposted this obvious response or provided one.
But you don't so maybe this time ? Or will it be another deflection?
amen brother...its a very low bar for the usual suspects round here but it still presents like Mt Everest for themBut only one is wrong and it's not CTID.
So again you post an article that doesn't back up your assertion.Another left wing rag - but here because anything else is considered RWNJ by the usual suspects
In Major Shift, NIH Admits Funding Risky Virus Research in Wuhan
A spokesman for Dr. Fauci says he has been “entirely truthful,” but a new letter belatedly acknowledging the National Institutes of Health’s support for virus-enhancing research adds more heat to the ongoing debate over whether a lab leak could have sparked the pandemic.www.vanityfair.com
On Wednesday, the NIH sent a letter to members of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce that acknowledged two facts. One was that EcoHealth Alliance, a New York City–based nonprofit that partners with far-flung laboratories to research and prevent the outbreak of emerging diseases, did indeed enhance a bat coronavirus to become potentially more infectious to humans, which the NIH letter described as an “unexpected result” of the research it funded that was carried out in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The second was that EcoHealth Alliance violated the terms of its grant conditions stipulating that it had to report if its research increased the viral growth of a pathogen by tenfold.
like cmon, how many different ways do you want to be told the same thing
The letter did not mention the phrase “gain-of-function research”
What are you guys even arguing over Fauci?
All I see is circle work saying the other is wrong...
amen brother...its a very low bar for the usual suspects round here but it still presents like Mt Everest for them
Nope... busy living in the real world.
The ABC holds both sides to account. The ALP are starting to release more policies now, in the run up to the election, so now they're being held to account. Prior to that, it was the Govt being held to account - because, you know, they're the ****ing Govt!
Up to this point the ALP has maintained a small target, content to sit back and let the LNP implode with scandal after disaster after scandal. With nothing to be held accountable for themselves, they received relatively little (negative or positive) attention from the ABC. Now, they're moving into election mode, so you can expect to see more ABC articles holding them to account - just as they've been holding the Govt to account.
The LNP wants the ABC to be nothing more than a propaganda machine, its private lapdog (much the same as the AFP is). The ABC fiercely maintains its independence, and that's something the LNP finds to be completely anathema. It's not bias, it's a lack of pro-LNP bias.
Yeah he's a major disappointment for sure, shoots for the moon but only hits the sh1thouse.He‘s like Meatloaf at the grand final.
You‘d think among all that shouting that once, just once, he’d hit a note. But no.