That would be the guys I’m talking aboutThis team hasn't even got many all-rounders in it. Unless you count Maxwell and Stoinis?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be the guys I’m talking aboutThis team hasn't even got many all-rounders in it. Unless you count Maxwell and Stoinis?
You do realise that Langer is not the sole selector?
They haven't won an ODI match in the nice guy era. Their record the last few years sure wasn't great but they were capable of winning one once in a while.In one day cricket?
Um, no it wasn’t.
It's a bit late for that. Cricket isn't going to survive another decade of this. It was already in pretty big trouble when it came to popularity with the youth.Higher up. The whole organisation, the reason we have no quality coming through. This has been brewing for a while and it’s a very long way back to the top. No one running the place wants to recognise change is needed so that’s the first step. Will still be a few years before this happens then another decade while new talent, brought up the right way technically, comes through. Most of the guys in the commentary box are the ones you want running the show. The ones that care about the direction of the game in this country.
Because he was playing test cricket for RSA most of that time... And making a boat load of runs.I know. Malan was their leading run scorer. I get it.
Markram didn’t even feature on the list - his inferior record was compiled without even getting on the park last summer domestically. Yet he was made captain of the side briefly.
24k? About 40% full?
Or everyone who got a Pass Out was recounted when they re-entered?
24k? About 40% full?
Or everyone who got a Pass Out was recounted when they re-entered?
Any chance some non-West Aussies can chip in with some scalps today?
They haven't won an ODI match in the nice guy era. Their record the last few years sure wasn't great but they were capable of winning one once in a while.
Because he was playing test cricket for RSA most of that time... And making a boat load of runs.
Honestly, you are the weirdest arguer I've seen on this forum. You argue for some people because of old records but when it comes to others you jump onto the other side of the rope. Then you conveniently ignore important pieces of information.
Here's a guide for you
1. Think of an opinion
2. Google.com
3. Get all information
4. Post
You do realise that Langer is not the sole selector?
I'm not even sure 24k would be a poor crowd, its not when ODIs are normally played and crowds have dropped for the format in recent years. It just doesn't look anything like 24k - it is hard to tell given the newness of the venue, but looks under a third full.If people thought the crowd was poor for this game, they will probably get worse for the remaining ODIs after a performance like this.