- May 3, 2007
- 36,610
- 21,202
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Man City, Valencia, Lazio, Panthers
good i appreciate it and I am glad you careThat obsession with Tony Abbott is crazy but your commitment to it is admirable to some extent.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
good i appreciate it and I am glad you careThat obsession with Tony Abbott is crazy but your commitment to it is admirable to some extent.
That obsession with Tony Abbott is crazy but your commitment to it is admirable to some extent.
Its suddenly become one WA side chasing Cam. GWS would have lost a bargaining chip with WC now needing a ruck man with Nic Nat going down. You would imagine WC chasing another tall forward would be out the window. Lobb would now be their target you would think.
Eagles have Lycett, not sure they need anyone else (not at the expense of a good pick or anything anyway). How many teams have genuinely good 3rd string ruckman? Can't think of any. 2 decent ruckman are a must, but if they both get injured, just got to hope it's not for too long...can't have great depth in every area.
Reckon the Eagles may still be interested in McCarthy at the right price.
Pretty sure that Lycett is more than sufficient as a back up ruckman.Its suddenly become one WA side chasing Cam. GWS would have lost a bargaining chip with WC now needing a ruck man with Nic Nat going down. You would imagine WC chasing another tall forward would be out the window. Lobb would now be their target you would think.
Pretty sure that Lycett is more than sufficient as a back up ruckman.
Pretty sure that Lycett is more than sufficient as a back up ruckman.
Easier said than done. There aren't any really genuinely high quality mids looking to go to WA afaik except Hill, who by all accounts wants to get to your mob to play with his brother, and it's extremely rare for a first year mid to have a genuine impact in a finals team, so a draftee isn't going to help really in that regard.Their midfield is still bog average in some areas though. I don't think Hutchings would get a game in many other sides.
If they want Cam, all power to them but if I was them I'd get loading up on a midfield to feed the key key forward in the comp.
Eagles have Lycett, not sure they need anyone else (not at the expense of a good pick or anything anyway). How many teams have genuinely good 3rd string ruckman? Can't think of any. 2 decent ruckman are a must, but if they both get injured, just got to hope it's not for too long...can't have great depth in every area.
Reckon the Eagles may still be interested in McCarthy at the right price.
Easier said than done. There aren't any really genuinely high quality mids looking to go to WA afaik except Hill, who by all accounts wants to get to your mob to play with his brother, and it's extremely rare for a first year mid to have a genuine impact in a finals team, so a draftee isn't going to help really in that regard.
Seems like a lot of Freo fans are trying their best to convince themselves the Eagles won't be interested in Cam's services and GWS will be forced to give him up for peanuts. I don't think it will play out that way.
Freo have been running with an average back up ruckman in Clark for years. It's rare to have a genuinely good quality back up ruck, because they usually go to another club to seek more opportunity as a first ruck in their own right.One average ruck man in Lycett is surely not enough . They need another ruck man. We all saw what happened to WC when Nic Nat was out.
It's a big assumption that Cam isn't on WC's radar just because Nic Nat got injured.Not saying that all. Cam would know longer be on the WC radar. GWS can ask for what ever they want ,its their right but it will be harder if WC don't show any interest.
It's a big assumption that Cam isn't on WC's radar just because Nic Nat got injured.
Its suddenly become one WA side chasing Cam. GWS would have lost a bargaining chip with WC now needing a ruck man with Nic Nat going down. You would imagine WC chasing another tall forward would be out the window. Lobb would now be their target you would think.
Easier said than done. There aren't any really genuinely high quality mids looking to go to WA afaik except Hill, who by all accounts wants to get to your mob to play with his brother, and it's extremely rare for a first year mid to have a genuine impact in a finals team, so a draftee isn't going to help really in that regard.
Seems like a lot of Freo fans are trying their best to convince themselves the Eagles won't be interested in Cam's services and GWS will be forced to give him up for peanuts. I don't think it will play out that way.
I don't think there's any doubt that his value has dropped, but a second or third rounder won't get it done. 2 firsts were offered last year apparently. Under the circumstances, 1 first would probably get it done. It's up to Freo to come up with a fair trade, GWS are under no obligation to trade Cam for unders.It seems some posters want to make Freo supporters out to be that. Cam's price is definitely lower this year and only a fool would say otherwise. It's just a matter of what that price is. Some think a top 10 pick. Some a 3rd rounder. It's most probably in the middle. A second rounder will get it done given the circumstances. I can see this being mediated a-la the Paddy Ryder deal if it drags on but it's a PR disaster for the AFL waiting to happen as well. Freo are taking on significant risk int he situation and that has to be taken into account. You might disagree and that's fine. It's a year where there's a fair few situations like this. Some posters want to give their first born for O'Meara while I would just run away as fast as I can from the guy. Who knows who is right but Cam is similar to me. Who knows how he will come back. Mitch Clark didn't come back very well at all from his lay off.
Depending on whether you believe media reports GWS never even let the conversation start regarding a trade for Cam. Full stop. But apparently we wanted him for peanuts. If you believe other reports we offered apparently at least pick 27 and our first this year (currently pick 3). Pick 27 ended up being Darcy Tucker. Nothing to sneeze at.
If GWS are dicks again and won't even consider a deal or are asking way too much then we should walk away on day one. Cam isn't going to take us from bottom 3 to an elite team. It's a marathon not a sprint for us right now.
I don't think there's any doubt that his value has dropped, but a second or third rounder won't get it done. 2 firsts were offered last year apparently. Under the circumstances, 1 first would probably get it done. It's up to Freo to come up with a fair trade, GWS are under no obligation to trade Cam for unders.
I don't think there's any doubt that his value has dropped, but a second or third rounder won't get it done. 2 firsts were offered last year apparently. Under the circumstances, 1 first would probably get it done. It's up to Freo to come up with a fair trade, GWS are under no obligation to trade Cam for unders.
I'm not demanding anything, given my club isn't involved in the trade. I'm just giving my opinion on what it will take to get the trade done, as is my right on a public forum.Last year Gubby Allan was very specific that Cam wasn't going anywhere, the 2 x 1st round picks was what the GWS supporter demanded from us. Much like you are doing now with your assertion that it must be a 1st rounder.
Word from Freo is that no offer was officially tabled because GWS simply refused to deal, as was their right.
I'm not demanding anything, given my club isn't involved in the trade. I'm just giving my opinion on what it will take to get the trade done, as is my right on a public forum.
but a second or third rounder won't get it done.
The reports on his mental issues has been scant, so lets assume he's got some stuff to deal with. Regardless of that fact, he's gone about this like an entitled brat.
If you need time away... then quit. No expectation, he's got enough coin and family in WA to get by and really work on what he needs to..... not everyone has that luxury. After 2 years he can always re-enter via the draft assuming he's had the Docs and such give him the advice that footy is a good positive thing for him.
If its not that big a deal, see out your contract in good faith and lay the foundations for a good trade to where you'd rather be. You don't always get what you want straight away and its a good life skill to be able to make the best out of the situation you find yourself in.
The child should be sent to the draft and play wherever he's told.