Toast Round 9 = Collingwood 120-55 GWS

[Pistol Night]

LOL just sit in the audience gallery at any family law court session - better yet spend a week sitting there and listening.

In 90% of cases the decision is slam dunk certain before the judge even enters the court - but that's just the beginning, the slander from counsel (hiding behind the impunity of the wig) and the outrageous paternity punishments are absolutely outrageous.

Just one week of observation will have even some teenagers having second thoughts about marriage.

At least with murder you only get 25 years

 

[Pistol Night]

My Mrs is never wrong, simple as. Saves a lot of argument.

She's actually smart and keeps shtum when she doesn't know the answer, that helps.

Unlike me

Same with mine. But every now and then when im 100% right i take a risk and back myself in. Foolishly this is a mistake

 

[jonbe54]

At least with murder you only get 25 years

Yep and even a short period of cohabitation - a matter of months - they can walk away and take half of everything you have ever worked for.

 

[Cousin of Daicos]

I will say though, it's going to be positively fascinating to see what our starting 23 will be should we not get any fresh injuries between now and the bye

By the time we get to the bye:

• Lipinski
• Cameron
• Frampton
• McStay

Should all be coming back in

Absolutely no clue who comes out for them outside Markov (who would be unlucky). Reef isn't a mainstay anyway.

Like, I know who I personally would bring out for those 4, but not sure who Fly goes with

I personally would go, Markov, Sidebottom, Hoskin-Elliott and McInnes from the team that played yesterday. But again, super tough given the form we're in.

There's an argument for Ash Johnson but I'd personally like to see how the forward line operates with McStay, Checkers, Ash, Bobby, Beau and Ginni myself at least once

 

[Pistol Night]

I will say though, it's going to be positively fascinating to see what our starting 23 will be should we not get any fresh injuries between now and the bye

By the time we get to the bye:

• Lipinski
• Cameron
• Frampton
• McStay

Should all be coming back in

Absolutely no clue who comes out for them outside Markov (who would be unlucky). Reef isn't a mainstay anyway.

Like, I know who I personally would bring out for those 4, but not sure who Fly goes with

I personally would go, Markov, Sidebottom, Hoskin-Elliott and McInnes from the team that played yesterday. But again, super tough given the form we're in.

The VFL team will be beating some AFL teams!

 

[sr36]

I get the technical ruling is if you contribute to the high contact (duck or lower knees) you will be called play on.

But if you lower yourself say 5cm and they tackle you 15cm too high you can't still tell me that it was all in relation to the contribution.

I reckon if you lower down like Hill did and they JUST get you on the neck that should be play on. But not to tackle high around the ears and not let go until they hit the deck.

Shambles.

They did have to do something about the milking of those frees and I really don't know what the answer is, but surely the answer isn't that you can rip a blokes head off if he tries to baulk a tackle.

 

[danielnajdek]

No way known he gets the three. Cox head and shoulders BOG, JDG and Titch next in line and Tom Green and Coniglio were probably better than Daicos as well.

Just remember it’s the umpires who give the votes. Wouldn’t surprise me at all if Nick gets the 2.

 

[jonbe54]

They did have to do something about the milking of those frees and I really don't know what the answer is, but surely the answer isn't that you can rip a blokes head off if he tries to baulk a tackle.

Agree in principal though not in detail.

If what you are doing isn't IN FACT milking a free but is instead following the rules of the game to the letter then it's the rule makers at fault NOT the player.

First cause applies - ALWAYS.

 

[Fat Jesus]

I will say though, it's going to be positively fascinating to see what our starting 23 will be should we not get any fresh injuries between now and the bye

By the time we get to the bye:

• Lipinski
• Cameron
• Frampton
• McStay

Should all be coming back in

Absolutely no clue who comes out for them outside Markov (who would be unlucky). Reef isn't a mainstay anyway.

Like, I know who I personally would bring out for those 4, but not sure who Fly goes with

I personally would go, Markov, Sidebottom, Hoskin-Elliott and McInnes from the team that played yesterday. But again, super tough given the form we're in.

There's an argument for Ash Johnson but I'd personally like to see how the forward line operates with McStay, Checkers, Ash, Bobby, Beau and Ginni myself at least once

What?
Only one out is Reef.
Are you trying to slow us down.
None of those ins cover for Markov.
WHE also starring and Sidebottom is just Sidebottom.

 

[Cousin of Daicos]

What?
Only one out is Reef.
Are you trying to slow us down.
None of those ins cover for Markov.
WHE also starring and Sidebottom is just Sidebottom.

ok...well you choose the 4 then

Because those 4 are coming in whether you like it or not and someone has to come out

 

[sr36]

I will say though, it's going to be positively fascinating to see what our starting 23 will be should we not get any fresh injuries between now and the bye

By the time we get to the bye:

• Lipinski
• Cameron
• Frampton
• McStay

Should all be coming back in

Absolutely no clue who comes out for them outside Markov (who would be unlucky). Reef isn't a mainstay anyway.

Like, I know who I personally would bring out for those 4, but not sure who Fly goes with

I personally would go, Markov, Sidebottom, Hoskin-Elliott and McInnes from the team that played yesterday. But again, super tough given the form we're in.

There's an argument for Ash Johnson but I'd personally like to see how the forward line operates with McStay, Checkers, Ash, Bobby, Beau and Ginni myself at least once

I'm not convinced we'll alter the balance of the team that much by playing so many talls.

 

[Pistol Night]

ok...well you choose the 4 then

Because those 4 are coming in whether you like it or not and someone has to come out

Thats some serious Mum reasoning there. Keeping with the weekend theme

 

[Fat Jesus]

ok...well you choose the 4 then

Because those 4 are coming in whether you like it or not and someone has to come out

Sure. They're not all coming in at once.
I can guarantee you that. Let's take out 3 of our best endurance runners to make you happy.
All in form mind you.

 

[sideswipe]

I'm not convinced we'll alter the balance of the team that much by playing so many talls.

We would also be altering the balance of the universe if we make it to the bye without any further injuries.

 

[Cousin of Daicos]

Sure. They're not all coming in at once.
I can guarantee you that. Let's take out 3 of our best endurance runners to make you happy.
All in form mind you.

Who isn't in form right this second?

You're arguing with me like I said those 4 suck.

I said this is tough because even Markov would be unlucky to be dropped right now. This is the beauty of having depth and competition for spots.

 

[Cousin of Daicos]

Thats some serious Mum reasoning there. Keeping with the weekend theme

Well, last I checked, you can't have more than 23 players on Game Day. Unless I missed something recently

 

[Pistol Night]

We would also be altering the balance of the universe if we make it to the bye without any further injuries.

Another big win and no injuries. What is this s**t. Never had to deal with this kind of situation

 

[Fat Jesus]

Who isn't in form right this second?

You're arguing with me like I said those 4 suck.

I said this is tough because even Markov would be unlucky to be dropped right now. This is the beauty of having depth and competition for spots.

You don't drop players in form mate.
Let alone the 3 you picked.
Bloody ridiculous.

 

[Pistol Night]

Well, last I checked, you can't have more than 23 players on Game Day. Unless I missed something recently

Good problem to have that were needing to drop in form players rather than replace injured ones

 

[sr36]

We would also be altering the balance of the universe if we make it to the bye without any further injuries.

I like it, trying a bit of reverse jinxology.

 

[sideswipe]

I like it, trying a bit of reverse jinxology.

I didn't realize I possessed the Power of Kirby until a jinxy post of mine brought on Frampton's training injury. Am now trying to right a wrong.

 

[Nebula1971]

I hope we can finally out to bed the nonsense rhetoric this board has spouted for years that Cox isn’t fit enough to first ruck.
Arguably the two best games of his career have been in the role and he’s only played 3 of his 97 games doing it.

That’s a fu(k1ng good point!!!!!

He monstered them all over the ground.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Nebula1971]

I know many were seeing this as a danger game, but I just felt the smashing in my bones!
Now I want a repeat next week!
Go Pies!!!

I feel like this week is a danger game. Wasn’t at all concerned about GWS.

The Blues will play their GF this week.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Nebula1971]

I don't know. Cox might steal the 3 votes off him

And DeGoey was more influential too IMO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Kirby]

Yep and even a short period of cohabitation - a matter of months - they can walk away and take half of everythign you have ever worked for.

Absolute rubbish