GreyCrow
TheBrownDog
- Mar 21, 2016
- 74,487
- 118,202
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, White Sox
He cant declassify them as a private citizenjust a question - are you Adam Schiff posting on these boards - you seem to be speaking exact Democrat talking points. We heard it all before leading into the Russia Hoax, then the Zelinsky phone call. The evidence is irrefutable, he's guilty, its a natiopnal security threat and the list went on..forgive me if I don't take a word of what you say as gospel and have very little faith in the 'investigations' from here.
It also seems the top brass republicans think very differently to you. Strange that if what you are saying was all true, that the very top republicans, the ones that sit on the Senate Judiciary Committee and House Judiciary Committee are not buying whats just happened and are promising to throw their full weight into proper investigation of this whole sorry mess. My money is at the end of this, it will come out as a nothing burger and will look exactly what it was - a political hit job
Interesting piece from Politifact - hardly a republican talking piece. They seem to think its uncharted territory as the president had the constitutional right to declassify documents
What to know about presidential declassification powers
The search warrant served on former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home appears to involve documents that investigawww.politifact.com
However, a subset of documents being sought by the government might be classified for national security reasons. If so, a law known as Section 1924 could come into play. This provision says that knowingly removing classified documents with the intent to keep them in an unauthorized location is a crime.
If charges are ever brought under the latter law, one obvious defense for Trump might be that he declassified these documents before leaving office. If that was done, then no classified documents would mean no crime.
.
.
.
.
However, experts cautioned that nothing is ordinary about the current situation involving Trump. In such an unusual and high-stakes scenario, it’s hard to be too certain about how the courts would rule.
"We’re in uncharted territory on the issue of criminally prosecuting a former president over mishandling classified documents," Moss said. "There is no legal precedent to look to for guidance. It raises all sorts of constitutional implications and it is anyone’s guess how it would play out."
Try not to hang, draw and quarter him before the real facts come to light - not a left wing media manufactured narrative
The stupidity of his supporters start out with '' the FBI planted them'' - to ' they are declassified'
So did he declassify documents the FBI planted? I mean that is prescience unheralded
I will agree he wont go down for treason - but his history of sucking off Putin makes this such a dangerous time for the USA