Perception should not be that Rucci is a good journalist.
Reality is that he is a terrible writer but has a big enough audience, even if much of it is driven by his trolling articles, to allow him to keep his job.
(Am I doing it right?)
I think so. It makes no sense
He's having a bit of trouble finding a crows-negative-spin-of-the-day at the moment?
I really can't work out his point. I understand the perception vs reality concept, but I really can't see the point he is making other than perception is the acutal reality of the AFC. In which case, why write the article? I could understand writing the article if perception is not reality, but not the other way around.