Autopsy AFL 2023 Round 22 - Blues v Demons Sat Aug 12th 7:25pm EST (MCG)

[Blues_Man]

Imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and Carlton got stripped of a goal. it’s easy sitting on your high horses after you’ve been gifted a game of football. You think this is embarrassing, it’d be a whole lot worse if it happened to Carlton.

Melbourne's s**t midfield gifted us the 4 points, Imagine how far if we had a full list to select from.

 

[Aphrodite]

Imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and Carlton got stripped of a goal. it’s easy sitting on your high horses after you’ve been gifted a game of football. You think this is embarrassing, it’d be a whole lot worse if it happened to Carlton.

Stripped of what goal & gifted a game.

Oh wow the salt continues!








Talk about embarrassing

This is hilarious

 

[CarnTheScray]

Melbourne's s**t midfield gifted us the 4 points, Imagine how far if we had a full list to select from.

You would probably be playing shitter if Kennedy, Silvagni, McKay and McGovern were playing. That group of players love their Benny Hill moments. We would offer them all a 5 year contract.

 

[Chism]

You would probably be playing shitter if Kennedy, Silvagni, McKay and McGovern were playing. That group of players love their Benny Hill moments. We would offer them all a 5 year contract.

Every one of those players would be walk up starts in your current team.

Just wish we had a Rory Lobb type player to help us i suppose……..

 

[Jeremias]

You would probably be playing shitter if Kennedy, Silvagni, McKay and McGovern were playing. That group of players love their Benny Hill moments. We would offer them all a 5 year contract.

Speaking of Benny Hill moments, has anyone edited your last minute on Sunday with that music on top?

 

[GordonBlue]

lol. Melbourne are better.

Salem idiot when he had the ball at 50 in space.

Carlton's luck will run out.

Thank you for giving us 2nd spot Carlton

How lucky would Carlton be if they get to play an opposition with 7 of their best 15 players out every week

 

[GordonBlue]

Melbourne AFL: 0
Carlton VFL: 1

Also

Melbourne VFL: 0
Carlton VFA: 1

 

[GordonBlue]

Melbourne unlucky, looked a goal but was always going ti be hard to overturn.

In the end Melbourne have one eye on the finals so while they wanted to win it won't mean much in a month.

Yeah, teams tend to look at games a month ahead when they lay 88 tackles.

I do love how every team that comes up against Carlton, just doesn't really want to win. I guess lucky Carlton, hey?

 

[lilJeffyG]

no prior, handballing motion. it's play on. A players reaction doesn't come into the equation.

The motion doesn't matter, last time I checked you have to get a first to the ball, and unfortunately that is impossible with one hand. It's been a throw since footy began not just on Sat night.

 

[CarnTheScray]

Speaking of Benny Hill moments, has anyone edited your last minute on Sunday with that music on top?

Already beat to it. Actually working on a two hour special for our last two seasons. Then maybe a 10 hour special for Carltons last ten seasons.

God you Carlton fans are sensitive.

 

[Redline]

Yeah, teams tend to look at games a month ahead when they lay 88 tackles.

I do love how every team that comes up against Carlton, just doesn't really want to win. I guess lucky Carlton, hey?

If you don't think the top 4 teams have had one eye on the finals for the last few weeks you are kidding yourself. Didn't say it was the difference just that the result in the big scheme of things won't mean much to Melbourne as long as they can secure the double chance.

 

[Skull Face]

If you don't think the top 4 teams have had one eye on the finals for the last few weeks you are kidding yourself. Didn't say it was the difference just that the result in the big scheme of things won't mean much to Melbourne as long as they can secure the double chance.

There is a huge difference between top 2 and top 4. Locking in that home final is probably the difference between making the grand final or just a prelim.

 

[sr36]

I think the other issue is the goal umpire assuming it was touched, but wasn't sure, so we get a video check. If he wasn't sure, if he didn't definitevely see or hear the ball touched, he should have called a goal. Aside from 100% definitive touches, umps should call it not touched and the burden is to prove it was touched, not that it wasn't.

That's my view too. The umpire has sent it to be reviewed because he doesn't know. Like with every marking contest or kick in general play- not touched should get the benefit of the doubt.

 

[HarryBeef]

That's my view too. The umpire has sent it to be reviewed because he doesn't know. Like with every marking contest or kick in general play- not touched should get the benefit of the doubt.

He didn't ask to check it was touched, he asked to check it was before the line.