Scandal Carey back to his old ways

Remove this Banner Ad

Brock Lesnar

Brock Lesnar

Senior List
Sep 20, 2014
230
317
AFL Club
GWS
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/ex...s/news-story/cf49f15f1e5de1a824f598e5252e83d8

WAYNE Carey’s ex-fiancee has issued the footy bad boy with a legal demand in which she accuses him of spreading salacious rumours about her amid a fiery breakdown of the couple’s relationship.

The Herald Sun can reveal Stephanie Edwards, a high-flying executive, has ended the five-year relationship and begun legal action directing Carey to cease making disparaging comments about her to friends and associates.

Sources close to Ms Edwards claim the former North Melbourne champ has spread damaging tales about her in a bid to sully her reputation.

It comes as Carey, 45, finds himself at the centre of fresh controversy after Ms Edwards has been presented with evidence of the Channel 7 commentator’s relationships with other women.

Carey and Ms Edwards split earlier this year. The mother of their 20-month-old baby, Charlotte, moved out of their home in April.

It is believed several of the allegations were made to Carey’s high-profile employers. Friends of Ms Edwards say she is concerned for her career: she is vice-president in recruitment at a prominent talent acquisitions firm.

Last night Carey’s manager, Chris Giannopoulos, confirmed that the couple had separated.

“They are trying to work through their issues,” he said.

It is believed several allegations about Ms Edwards were made to Carey’s high-profile employers, and her friends say she is concerned for her career.

The pair had celebrated their engagement last September.

Ms Edwards told the Herald Sun then she knew what she was getting into when beginning a relationship with the philandering premiership player, known in footy circles as The King.

Sources close to her say she has tried to quietly deal with the fallout of their split with “class and dignity”.

Friends close to Ms Edwards say she had been compelled to issue legal proceedings after false allegations about her continued to be made.

Carey has been at pains to keep his media career comeback on track.

But it is understood the former North Melbourne great was given a serve about his lifestyle by his Seven bosses late last year.

“A leopard doesn’t change (its spots),” a well-placed source close to Carey said.

Friends of Ms Edwards say she is well and truly done with her partner of five years: “Unfortunately, bad boy Wayne never left. We were all pretty fooled.

“That was the hardest hit for her. There has been so much momentum around Wayne and how he has changed, which he has peddled commercially.

“It (the cheating) is pretty rife. At least Stephanie got a beautiful daughter out of the relationship, and he is the one who will end up sad and lonely with a bunch of 20-year-olds.”

The Channel 7 commentator also has 10-year-old daughter Ella with ex-wife Sally.

Carey has spent time in a US jail for assaulting Miami police who were called after what he claims was an accidental glassing of his then girlfriend, Kate Neilson. They were reportedly engaged in 2009, but split soon afterwards.

Ms Edwards has sought counsel from Carey’s first wife, Sally, as she deals with the fallout of the relationship breakup.

“Sally is great and has been a class act from day one,” a source close to Ms Edwards said.

“The two have been adamant that whatever happens to Wayne, Charlotte and Ella’s best interests are front and centre. She is so relieved they are on the same page with that.”

Carey and his lawyers were sent legal letters last week. When contacted, Ms Edwards told the Herald Sun she could not comment as she was legally bound not to do so.

This is the latest in a string of scandals involving the fallen AFL spearhead.

Phoenix-like, Carey has rebuilt his career from the ashes, working at Seven and at Triple M, presenting himself as a reformed family man who has changed his bad boy ways.

“Wayne thinks he is protected, but really people are just waiting for him to stuff up,” the source close to Ms Edwards said
Click to expand...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

captain cotch 9 said:
Easy article to wright IMO.
Personal issue so leave it at that.
No one elses business
Click to expand...


When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you write. You can write good and copyright but copyright doesn't mean copy good - it might not be right good copy, right?

Now, writers of religious services write rite, and thus have the right to copyright the rite they write.

Conservatives write right copy, and have the right to copyright the right copy they write. A right wing cleric might write right rite, and have the right to copyright the right rite he has the right to write. His editor has the job of making the right rite copy right before the copyright would be right. Then it might be copy good copyright.

Should Thom Wright decide to write, then Wright might write right rite, which Wright has a right to copyright. Copying that rite would copy Wright's right rite, and thus violate copyright, so Wright would have the legal right to right the wrong. Right?

Legals write writs which is a right or not write writs right but all writs, copied or not, are writs that are copyright. Judges make writers write writs right.

Advertisers write copy which is copyright the copy writer's company, not the right of the writer to copyright. But the copy written is copyrighted as written, right?

Wrongfully copying a right writ, a right rite or copy is not right.
 
Wayne Dwop said:
When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you write. You can write good and copyright but copyright doesn't mean copy good - it might not be right good copy, right?

Now, writers of religious services write rite, and thus have the right to copyright the rite they write.

Conservatives write right copy, and have the right to copyright the right copy they write. A right wing cleric might write right rite, and have the right to copyright the right rite he has the right to write. His editor has the job of making the right rite copy right before the copyright would be right. Then it might be copy good copyright.

Should Thom Wright decide to write, then Wright might write right rite, which Wright has a right to copyright. Copying that rite would copy Wright's right rite, and thus violate copyright, so Wright would have the legal right to right the wrong. Right?

Legals write writs which is a right or not write writs right but all writs, copied or not, are writs that are copyright. Judges make writers write writs right.

Advertisers write copy which is copyright the copy writer's company, not the right of the writer to copyright. But the copy written is copyrighted as written, right?

Wrongfully copying a right writ, a right rite or copy is not right.
Click to expand...

15.gif
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

MEB_ said:
Someone on the Carlton board alluded to a rumour involving Murphy and Carey but hasn't given any detail and it has since been deleted. Any thoughts?
Click to expand...

Heard the exact same thing from a bloke who hangs around that scene... did the deed with murphs misso.

Heard it a few weeks ago but thought nothing of it
 
Milanista28 said:
If stunning young sluts were throwing themselves at you all the time it would be so ******* hard to be in a committed relationship.

Just play the field Wayne, You're allowed to do that FFS.
Click to expand...
No, it wouldn't be hard at all if you were in a committed relationship. FMD
 
Arathrawn said:
There is a spot of irony here.

She is concerned for her career because of things he is saying about her.
She goes public saying things about him and it puts his career in jeopardy.
Click to expand...
that's not ironic. Not even slightly. How exactly is she "going public saying things about him"?

Beginning legal action to stop his actions doesn't mean she's doing what he's doing. She's not going public, she's not disparaging him to friends, she's trying to make hims stop.
 
Lance Uppercut said:
that's not ironic. Not even slightly. How exactly is she "going public saying things about him"?

Beginning legal action to stop his actions doesn't mean she's doing what he's doing. She's not going public, she's not disparaging him to friends, she's trying to make hims stop.
Click to expand...
Going to court and talking to the HeraldScum is 100% going public.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BigVic
Rumour Ross Lyon back to Freo and rift
Replies
21
Views
5K
ruck r0v3r
R
R
  • Locked
Rumour Dogs financial squeeze?? - ordered tp pay $6m compensation to victim of historic paedophilia
Replies
1
Views
2K
Gralin
Gralin
Black Panther
Rumour Carey v. Stevens II : The long awaited rematch
3 4 5 6 7
Replies
168
Views
30K
Scallop Industry Thug
Scallop Industry Thug
Chief
Admin Announcement Drug talk: No thanks. It's always been that way on BigFooty
Replies
0
Views
2K
Chief
Chief
Black Panther
Scandal Liam Jurrah back in jail (again)
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
134
Views
27K
sharp450
sharp450
M
Rumour Simon Goodwin resigning today?
2 3 4 5
Replies
101
Views
13K
stinga82
S
Donakebab
Scandal Barry Cable being sued for historical child sexual abuse
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
140
Views
18K
Aussie in exile
A

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top