Jackson up to $900k for 7 years on his thread.
Traded Junior Rioli (West Coast) - [to Port Adelaide in multi-club trade]
- Thread starter Marcel Proust
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- May 5, 2006
- 62,726
- 70,017
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Well given GWS traded 12 + 18 + a future first for pick 4 in 2019, I'd say that's a good starting point.
The earlier the pick, the higher the premium.
Pick 2 = 2517 points, which is roughly equal to pick 8 (1551) + pick 18 (985). Do you reckon if you had pick 2 you'd hand it over for 8 + 18? Didn't think so.
GWS could offer 12, 15, 19 or a trade involving a future first. Hawthorn could offer 6 and a future first. I don't profess to know the motivations of each club, but clubs that aren't Gold Coast don't tend to hand over top 2 picks cheaply. Prior to the trade with Melbourne Port could have offered 8, 27, future first for 2.
None of this really has much to do with Junior Rioli. Port's motivation to get pick 2 to trade for JHF should be a separate thing. I ex whpect if Port actually did acquire that pick North would want more to go with it which is beyond Port's capability without including a player.
You said you were confident if pick 2 was on the table u get a better offer and I asked you to name them
Hawks pick 6 plus future 1st?
Not remotely likely. Ask hawks fans and they would hate that trade.
12,15,19 from gws?
I think that’s fairly unlikely while they have 3 unless eagles threaten to take cadman and I don’t see that remotely likely.
- May 5, 2006
- 62,726
- 70,017
- AFL Club
- West Coast
OK you carry on believing 8 and a future first for pick 2 and Junior Rioli is a good deal and WC are big bad meanies for not agreeing to it.
- Mar 25, 2003
- 35,681
- 28,334
- Mar 25, 2003
- 35,681
- 28,334
No, the post said IF pick 2 was put on the table we'd get a better deal, which we would. Few clubs would tradie it for pick 8 plus another pick probably between 10 and 14, although the value is not too far off. There's a chance Port implode next year for sure which would make it great value, but it's too big of a risk for our first seriously premium pick since Andrew Gaff in 2010. You are more likely to rebound and get back into the top four than you are to implode and finish in the bottom four IMO.
There are no offers for There's literally zero incentive for a club to trade pick 2 (or any top few picks for that matter) unless they are coming out well in front.
Port fans seem to have gotten it into their heads that we are somehow now responsible for trading pick 2.
Most Eagles fans (though not all) would be pretty happy with that. Personally, I would. I've got no problem with the club trying to play chicken to get more. I suspect there is lingering resentment from the Ebert trade.
Isn’t GWS offering 3 and 12 for pick 1? If the player they want isn’t taken number 1, wouldn’t they offer a similar deal for pick 2?
- Jan 20, 2015
- 2,583
- 4,824
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Is anyone still at the club that was involved with the Ebert trade? It was 10 years ago. Surely normal people don’t hold a grudge for that long.
- Sep 3, 2018
- 4,215
- 5,488
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
North won’t trade pick 1. They need Cadman. Assuming they get pick 2 - Wardlaw and Cadman would be a great result for them
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
- Aug 6, 2021
- 8,631
- 23,449
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Port out: 43 + 53 + 57 + 60 + F1 + Butters
Port In: JHF + Rioli + 40
Brisbane out: 21 (878 pts)
Brisbane in: 43 + 53 + 57 + 60 (939pts)
North in: Butters, pick 21
North out: JHF
WC out: Rioli, pick 40
WC in: Port F1
Port In: JHF + Rioli + 40
Brisbane out: 21 (878 pts)
Brisbane in: 43 + 53 + 57 + 60 (939pts)
North in: Butters, pick 21
North out: JHF
WC out: Rioli, pick 40
WC in: Port F1
The fact that north fans think
A) they can get butters out of port
B) they could get butters, who would be wanted by every team in the league to want to go to north right now
C) that butters is only worth a fraction of jhf
Is laughable and a little sad.
A) they can get butters out of port
B) they could get butters, who would be wanted by every team in the league to want to go to north right now
C) that butters is only worth a fraction of jhf
Is laughable and a little sad.
- Aug 20, 2017
- 1,517
- 1,448
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
You haven’t said this enough in the JHF thread.Time to cough up Georgiades to get JHF & Rioli done, Power
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
why take that risk and surely they are going all in for Caldman
If there is a pick swap is between WC and Port then why wouldn't WC tie them together?
I agree WC should look for better offers from other clubs for pick 2, as should Port if they think they can a high enough pick to satisfy Nth from elsewhere.
Seems like hes headed to the PSD. which i dont mind, cant imagine anyone else picking up his contract for 4 years and if they do wont loose any sleep over it.
Will be nice getting something for free for a change
Will be nice getting something for free for a change
- Aug 13, 2013
- 21,219
- 14,903
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- East Fremantle Sharks
- Banned
- #1,669
Yeah he will look good in a Kangaroos or Bombers jumper
JHF staying at Kangaroos if Port keep lowballing
- Aug 20, 2017
- 1,517
- 1,448
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Jack Martin made it to Carlton in the psd. Nobody else is offering him as much as us, why wouldn’t he make it to port?
He could also just re-sign.
Im a westcoast fan and I’d rather have butters than Francais.
- Aug 13, 2013
- 21,219
- 14,903
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- East Fremantle Sharks
- Banned
- #1,673
Sounds like PSD is a sure thing then
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Essendon would have the cap easily
Similar threads
