Traded Toby Nankervis [traded to Richmond for pick 46]

[Apex36]

No. I don't think Richmond approached Nankervis and said "Maybe in a couple of years, sooner if you're good enough." And if they did, I have no doubt Nankervis would have said "Go and get stuffed, I'll talk to the Dogs."

You mean the dogs who have Roughead, Boyd and Campbell who would all be ahead of him?

Sounds like a much better option.

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

You mean the dogs who have Roughead, Boyd and Campbell who would all be ahead of him?

Sounds like a much better option.

Yep. The Dogs who would prefer to play Roughead as a key back, Boyd as a key forward, and Campbell in the Reserves.

 

[Apex36]

Yep. The Dogs who would prefer to play Roughead as a key back, Boyd as a key forward, and Campbell in the Reserves.

Pretty sure they're fine with Roughy through the ruck and Boyd playing the role he destroyed your mob in a couple of weeks ago. And you're underrating Campbell. He is quite handy in both a primary ruck and forward/ruck role. Better than Nank anyway.

 

[FreeAgent1]

He is worth pick in late 30s.

So swans will trade 39 and Nank for 26....does this really enrage anyone?

 

[BruceFromBalnarring]

Pretty sure they're fine with Roughy through the ruck and Boyd playing the role he destroyed your mob in a couple of weeks ago. And you're underrating Campbell. He is quite handy in both a primary ruck and forward/ruck role. Better than Nank anyway.

Yeah. Of course he is. I mean every player over 6' is a better ruck/forward than Nankervis.

You're speaking s**t. That's been demonstrated over and over. Now if I continue with this I'll get suspended. My tolerance for s**t speaking posters like yourself has limits. You don't have a clue. 2017 will prove that. Come back to me when Nankervis plays next year out in the Reserves.

 

[Apex36]

Yeah. Of course he is. I mean every player over 6' is a better ruck/forward than Nankervis.

You're speaking s**t. That's been demonstrated over and over. Now if I continue with this I'll get suspended. My tolerance for s**t speaking posters like yourself has limits. You don't have a clue. 2017 will prove that. Come back to me when Nankervis plays next year out in the Reserves.

Lol. How dare I suggest a trade that's fair value for your 4th in line ruckman. Doesn't the fact that it's basically you and 1 other Swans supporter arguing he's worth more than a pick in the 40's say something to you?

Don't be upset, the Swans have one of the best recruiting departments in the league. You'll probably uncover Allir MKII with 46.

 

[swanton]

If the prestia deal go ahead as mentioned on afl website

I wonder if something like 17+ nanka for 24 and 27 would be fair ??

 

[Stevi_Tigers]

dan richardson on trade radio saying deal will be done this arvo or first thing tomorrow morning

 

[The Gong]

dan richardson on trade radio saying deal will be done this arvo or first thing tomorrow morning

So be it. Best of luck to the Nank and the Tigers. I think and hope it'll be a good trade for all concerned.

 

[Stevi_Tigers]

So be it. Best of luck to the Nank and the Tigers. I think and hope it'll be a good trade for all concerned.

yeah seems a pretty simple deal. you guys have to many rucks we need a ruck.

 

[juss]

So what are we giving up for the Nank? I reckon he's at that age where ruckmen start to come good and comes from a good club, so pretty happy to have him moving forward, but depends on the price.

 

[replicant]

Well hasn't this turned into a nice little p****** contest!?

Nank will go for a reasonable price, because that's what the Swans do. We don't seem to care if we get pick 35 or 45, we trust our recruiting and development system. If we had Academy kids this year, we might try and squeeze a few extra places but i think we'll just take 46 or make a swap of picks and be done with it.

Quote myself, because according to AFL.com i nailed it.

 

[blaisee]

Pick 46, just finalised now

 

[Stevi_Tigers]

done for 46 good deal for us

 

[grimlock]

 

[replicant]

See rfctiger74 , into every grey day comes a little ray of sunshine.

Enjoy your discounted Nank.

 

[blaisee]

Pick 46, is the pick you want to give for a ruckman. It reduces any pressure on him at all.

If Hampson was traded for Pick 46 from carlton we would think that he was a bargain

 

[MotleyLemon]

Pick 46 was what he was worth.

 

[Moist Biscuit]

Fair trade imo.

 

[Apex36]

*cough*

It was fun having people get upset at me for suggesting he be traded for 46.

 

[Caj]

*cough*

It was fun having people get upset at me for suggesting he be traded for 46.

Was never going to be any different, just don't get upset when Witts goes for 44

 

[The Gong]

Knowing our trading history pick 14 will be a dud and pick 46 will be a triple Brownlow medalist. We'll take that.

Fair trade. Good luck and thanks for the memories Nanka.

 

[Apex36]

Was never going to be any different, just don't get upset when Witts goes for 44

I'm preparing myself for the worst tbh. I know for a fact that Collingwood rates him highly, and Eade rates him highly, and Collingwood are determined to get maximum value for him, but I have a nagging feeling I'm going to end up disappointed. Such is life.

 

[lamaros]

Was never going to be any different, just don't get upset when Witts goes for 44

That's way overs.

 

[juss]

Very happy with this trade.