List Mgmt. OFFICIAL: Dangerfield + Pick 50 for Picks 9, 28 and Dean Gore

[Kane McGoodwin]

There is a little bit more on your board than what there is on ours though KMG.

Personally, I don't see much difference - I think it depends whether you are looking through a blue/white or blue/red/yellow lense

Some of the things said on both boards have been too personal - both to posters, clubs & cites & quite frankly childish.

Always said, play the ball not the man.

Kudos to both moderators, particularly as there will always be complaints the are too lenient or too tough, as posters have different tolerance levels.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Genuine question. Can the crows match a 2 year say $2.6 million 2 year offer within your cap?

The Cats have been working to maximise available space for a while now. They did not delist Stevie J without good reason. The AFL isnt going to give you any wiggle room as the club most recently penalised for a cap breach.

My estimate is we could match up to $1.5m pa... however, not sure we would want to go that high.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Sorry mate, I just listened to Paul Connors on SEN last Saturday, and he never mentioned Danger going to the draft in any way.
http://www.sen.com.au/programs/crunch-time#5d6ARmt7y5Ir5xZj.97

If he was on SEN at another time in the last week or so, can you link me the audio, please?

Paul Connors would be lucky to keep his job if Danger went into the draft.

Mardi would be beside herself, as really wants to get back home.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Personally after resigning Tex and Sloane to new deals I wouldn't think we would be in a position to match it.

Yes we are - which is why we haven't signed up all our players yet like M Crouch. Watch us complete our contracts once the FA period is over.

 

[Daniel McL]

Read this pages posts & thought I was in an Adelaide thread...

 

[Stan The Caddy]

Personally, I don't see much difference - I think it depends whether you are looking through a blue/white or blue/red/yellow lense

Some of the things said on both boards have been too personal - both to posters, clubs & cites & quite frankly childish.

Always said, play the ball not the man.

Kudos to both moderators, particularly as there will always be complaints the are too lenient or too tough, as posters have different tolerance levels.

I find it hard to disagree with too much from this post TBH. However I will say that the volume of childish posts is larger on your board compared to ours, but then again I don't visit your board nearly as much so perhaps I'm mistaken.

Seeing as though your mate Vader won't take my bet, would you be interested? Just a bit of fun to spice things up?

 

[Strangled Cat]

I posted up this on the Adelaide board and I was hoping to also balance it with a Geelong supporter's perspective. For mine, it's the ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM that I'd want to part with.

So hypothetically if one proposed the following:

Geelong sends its first round draft pick #9 + its second round draft pick this year #28* and its second round draft pick next year, its third round draft pick #46* plus Jarrad Jansen to Brisbane. Brisbane sends Aish and Redden, its second round draft pick #20* plus its fourth round draft pick #56 to Adelaide as well as on-trading pick #46 from Geelong. Adelaide sends Dangerfield, its second round draft pick #33*, its third round draft pick #51* and on-trades Brisbane's fourth rounder to Geelong.

*denotes picks before adjusted for Free Agency compensation

In summary:

Brisbane

IN: Pick #9, pick #28, 2016 second round draft pick (Geelong) and Jarrad Jansen.

OUT: Aish, Redden, pick #20, pick #56

Adelaide

IN: Aish, Redden, pick #20 and pick #46

OUT: Dangerfield, pick #33, pick #51

Geelong

IN: Dangerfield, pick #33, pick #51, pick #56

OUT: Pick #9, pick #28, pick #46, 2016 second round draft pick and Jarrad Jansen.

How would that deal sit?

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

I find it hard to disagree with too much from this post TBH. However I will say that the volume of childish posts is larger on your board compared to ours, but then again I don't visit your board nearly as much so perhaps I'm mistaken.

Seeing as though your mate Vader won't take my bet, would you be interested? Just a bit of fun to spice things up?

I haven't even been following your proposed bet with Vader...

 

[Donkey Magoo]

Minimum value is the tipping point at which the weakest concedes they can't extract any more and the strongest knows they need not pay any more.

So my goal isn't war with Cat supporters, In the real world I have a lot of you as close friends (disproportionately in fact), I enjoy your success.
Our trade will be equitable because you guys are good blokes and so are we. If this were Bombers Vs Hawks then sure they would screw each other to the bottom.

 

[Donkey Magoo]

I posted up this on the Adelaide board and I was hoping to also balance it with a Geelong supporter's perspective. For mine, it's the ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM that I'd want to part with.

I like it mate. We get a bit of developed talent and some future.

 

[Cataholic]

So my goal isn't war with Cat supporters, In the real world I have a lot of you as close friends (disproportionately in fact), I enjoy your success.
Our trade will be equitable because you guys are good blokes and so are we. If this were Bombers Vs Hawks then sure they would screw each other to the bottom.

Yeah, I think the PD saga will actually be a little more palatable to both sides than worse case scenario, but that said there's no doubt the balance of power lays with PD and the GFC in this exchange.

 

[cats_09]

Danger and Sloane please.

Adelaide can keep Sloane, but if they wanted to throw in Jacobs instead

 

[Donkey Magoo]

The sad thing for me is that in reality, you can't replace PD. He is a man of high integrity, so competitive, a good field leader, Oh, and really good at football.
We will trade this out because it's the right thing to do.

 

[Donkey Magoo]

Adelaide can keep Sloane, but if they wanted to throw in Jacobs instead

Never touch a man's sauce.

 

[Catastic82]

The sad thing for me is that in reality, you can't replace PD. He is a man of high integrity, so competitive, a good field leader, Oh, and really good at football.
We will trade this out because it's the right thing to do.

Don't have much of a choice in the matter it's not like you're doing the noble thing.

 

[Donkey Magoo]

Don't have much of a choice in the matter it's not like you're doing the noble thing.

how so?

 

[Catastic82]

how so?

Don't trade/accept compo and you get no picks. It's not as if AFC cares about where he ends up as they can't shop him around because of his preference to GFC, nor can they just let him go to the PSD and get nothing .

So like I said it's not like you have a choice in the matter

 

[vinum coupe]

It's okay everyone on the internet is a bot, except you.

Syntaxerror

 

[Footy Smarts]

I can't believe so many people are convinced that we're such good blokes that we'll trade a massive amount when we don't have to.

I still think the chances of danger coming here through trade rather than free agency are tiny.

 

[xtatik222k]

The sad thing for me is that in reality, you can't replace PD. He is a man of high integrity, so competitive, a good field leader, Oh, and really good at football.
We will trade this out because it's the right thing to do.

Sensible post. Danger as an individual is irreplaceable from us, because we don't have anyone as good as him. A like-for-like trade would be something like Motlop and Guthrie for Danger. Honestly, he's that good.

 

[rocker_oz33]

Adelaide can keep Sloane, but if they wanted to throw in Jacobs instead

I like Sloane wish we drafted him.

 

[Moggy]

Syntaxerror

Jeez, you're a 'bot running on a C64!

Explains the load times... ;-)

 

[Jhye Clark 13]

Sensible post. Danger as an individual is irreplaceable from us, because we don't have anyone as good as him. A like-for-like trade would be something like Motlop and Guthrie for Danger. Honestly, he's that good.

And you're underestimating Guthrie's potential as a player.

 

[Strangled Cat]

I can't believe so many people are convinced that we're such good blokes that we'll trade a massive amount when we don't have to.

I still think the chances of danger coming here through trade rather than free agency are tiny.

I hope you're right, chief. What makes you think the Crows won't match? Do you reckon it's all just a bit of chest-puffing on their bahalf?

 

[Footy_Fan2007]

I honestly think the reason for the Kelly, stokes, sj delistings are that we will load up huge on years 1 & 2. If Geelong say they will pay him 1.8 mill for the first 2 years surely Adelaide cannot match that.