- May 4, 2016
- 4,309
- 12,365
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
wtf i love kane cornes nowCornes : Howard is a future All-Australian, St.Kilda have nailed this trade.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wtf i love kane cornes nowCornes : Howard is a future All-Australian, St.Kilda have nailed this trade.
I would prefer Frampton over Ryderlol adelaide just got Billy Frampton for future 4th.
i'd have preferred him along with ryder, howard instead of the 4th they sent us.
What other key forward this trade can you get for pick 20+ that is proven?
Whichever way you cut it, Bell's posturing enabled us to get Dougal.
I very highly doubt Port would've accepted a 2nd round pick (even though that's what the points equivalent add up to) as it didn't fit in their visual demands of a "1st round" which they put out in their statement late last week when Doogs initially nominated.
Thanks Bellend.
perfect age demographic as well. Can play forward/ruck. Ideal partner for RoMA i'd have thought untill Bing arrived.I would prefer Frampton over Ryder
That’s four. Get Jones as the fifth and who’s next.I reckon Port's 4th rounder will go to Richmond for Butler
Give us 18 and 29 for Keath.Could this suggestion on Ports board work ?
"We will surely now trade 18 and 29 for 13 and a late pick for points from the Doggies. This gets them Bruce/Keath and gets us 2 first round picks + Mead."
Haha will be interesting. I thought the trade we knocked back the other day was pretty fair for all. Looks like we are adamant 13 isn't involved. I personally think Bruce is a pick somewhere between 20-26. 32 under 13 overs so no idea how this plays out now
Would you rather our Rd 1 Future Pick be goneso we are giving a future 2nd and third for I think the third year in a row - that's the way to do it Sainters!
Values Ryder+Howard at pick 15: https://www.draftguru.com.au/pick-value-calculator#Ryder,Howard,10,63|12,18,41
I think that's pretty fair personally.
pick 16 for howard is that really bending em over??
Its such a great trade because we turned 6 into 10 and Howard.
You should target Jenkins instead if 32pick is used.Could say that with any player. thats just my opinion on what he is worth. If you think straight swap for 13 is fair that is cool to. That's your opinion. I feel the only way it will get done now is Bruce Dogs 32 swans Jones Saints. We get a good deal there but can't see any other way it happens except maybe we give you a 3rd as well. Obviously you guys could keep him which you are entitled to as well.
Dogs may be left high and dry unless they get a move on. Not chasing King now and so that means we do not need to trade Bruce to land all our targets.
You NEED Bruce next year. You window is nigh. Differ and wither.
What evens it out for us is the Giants swap. That was an absolute godsend. More needs to be made of how well the guys did to get that when other clubs were in the market to do the same.Don’t listen to the gronk Freo supporters or be fooled by their (& Bellend’s) absurd expectations for Hill. Pick 10 & future 2nd is still slight overs for a player of Hill’s ilk. Pick 10 was spot on & we paid a little extra due to the contractual circumstances. Lethlean & Gubby also did Bellend a massive favour & didnt completely embarrass him. I think Bellend would’ve been pleading for this deal in the end. Hopefully the honourable nature of Lethlean is paid in return for future negotiations with Freo.
In Satan we TrustI wonder how we get Jones now?
Could this suggestion on Ports board work ?
"We will surely now trade 18 and 29 for 13 and a late pick for points from the Doggies. This gets them Bruce/Keath and gets us 2 first round picks + Mead."
Yeah I agree, I'm just talking from an optics perspective for Port to sell the trade. Not that it's working as their supporters are ropable.The points are not relevant .
If you have pick 10 there will be a few players to choose from, who will probably be at LEAST good.
You might take 2 second rounders and have them both wash out . ( ie : Wright and Markworth ).