Congrats to you Lampers, you have a high football IQ, with your last paragraph intellectually perceptive, extremely intuitive and spot on, bloody hell I wish there were more Big footy members that were like you, rather than just trolling or pumping up their own tyres or egos to make themselves feel better, but one things for sure, I'll keep my eye on you in future, many thanks Richard.Goodwin is pretty stubborn, I don’t see him moving away from what worked last year in a hurry.
If he changed it up and put Petracca forward, which he did do when Petracca had the ‘flu against Fremantle, he wouldn’t take Brayshaw out of the backline.
It would mean more midfield time for Harmes and Sparrow, or potentially Dunstan comes back into the team.
Back to the topic of how to stop Melbourne. Simply play better, like Geelong did. Plus 13 scoring shots, plus 20 inside 50s and plus 18 clearances. Melbourne still won contested possession, but Geelong had better quality contested possession.
While Melbourne’s forward line is really struggling, it’s not why they lost, and moving Petracca almost completely out of the midfield to play forward is probably going to hurt why Melbourne lost even more.
May had his worst ball in hand game
I can recall. The fumbling early from multiple players and the general butchering of the ball was the worst Melbourne have done this year. If that becomes the norm then they will be stopped several more times.
What I thought was very noticeable was Geelong got a hand in to disrupt the handpass chains multiple times for the players who do use quick hands. They were also right onto Viney and Harmes who like to try and bounce off or break tackles rather than use quick hands. They defended the right way against particular players.