Shouldn't have delisted Sam Collins - 25 disposals 16 marks and BOG for Werribee today in their two point win.
Relevant to thread topic how?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shouldn't have delisted Sam Collins - 25 disposals 16 marks and BOG for Werribee today in their two point win.
Has the aerobic ability to match as well. Been carrying injuries the majority of the season so plenty of upside to come.If the rules were changed requiring a forward inside fifty always, Alex Pearce would be the man. Very fast off a burst, good mark overhead. All the fast off the mark talls will become huge weapons. It would be exciting viewing.
We'll trade him to you for 1st rounder?Shouldn't have delisted Sam Collins - 25 disposals 16 marks and BOG for Werribee today in their two point win.
We'll trade him to you for 1st rounder?
Arguably best state footballer going around - same when he played with Peel for us... couldn't translate it at AFL level for us though unfortunately.
Thanks for clearing that up, memory isn't what it used to be, but it is relevant to the conversation ofYes, Connolly didn't want Croad, and didn't think we needed him in our backline*, but that is totally different conversation. Schwab recruited Croad, and then recruited Connolly. Croad kicked 42 goals in his first season (14th in the AFL) despite it being his first year being played as a KPF. We dream that McCarthy might do the same. A forward line containing Pavlich, Croad, Polak and J Longmuir should have been amazing.
* We had a raft of defenders including MacPharlin, Haddril, Parker, Brown, Jones, MacPhee and Grover. Croad was indeed a better defender, but we just didn't need him there.
We should have kept him instead of a last legs Johnson.
Bulked up at Freo, playing the McGovern intercept role now so probably has gained pace? But by reports reading the play well.Both would’ve been gone end of this year anyway.
If you go the D + T board there’s a guy that puts the top 30 players in WAFL each week etc. There’s a lot of ex-AFL hacks in that lot. Just goes to show imo that no matter what anyone tries to say AFL and state leagues are miles apart. I’m beyond confident Collins won’t make it at AFL level unless he magically gains 2-3 cms, several yards worth or pace and improves his foot skills out of sight .... yea not going to happen.
Bulked up at Freo, playing the McGovern intercept role now so probably has gained pace? But by reports reading the play well.
Wasn't a power defender, but the real question is why we delisted and went for so many rucks?
My guess is because they take so long to develop and once Sandi retires it will be Darcy then unproven blokes.Bulked up at Freo, playing the McGovern intercept role now so probably has gained pace? But by reports reading the play well.
Wasn't a power defender, but the real question is why we delisted and went for so many rucks?
Didn't both of them come to Freo in 2002? Regardless Connolly played him out of position, or where Croad liked to play.
His best footy was in the backline.
Thanks for clearing that up, memory isn't what it used to be, but it is relevant to the conversation of
McGovern playing forward for us.
If you go the D + T board there’s a guy that puts the top 30 players in WAFL each week etc. There’s a lot of ex-AFL hacks in that lot. Just goes to show imo that no matter what anyone tries to say AFL and state leagues are miles apart. I’m beyond confident Collins won’t make it at AFL level unless he magically gains 2-3 cms, several yards worth or pace and improves his foot skills out of sight .... yea not going to happen.
We should have kept him instead of a last legs Johnson.
Holly moses you guys are reasonable people.
I went into the west coast thread and they are proclaiming a decent trade would be Scott Lycett for kelly.
I think we will deal with Fremantle if the club has a similar fair mentality
Is that really so unreasonable?
Lycett is only 25 and is one of the better rucks around especially since most rucks reach their prime mid-late twenties. Would fill a position you guys are in desperate need to be filled
Kelly is good and all but Geelong have plenty of top flight mids.
I doubt the trade will happen though. Given the news that came out today West Coast need Scott Lycett far more then they need a player like Kelly.
Lycett is a solid support level ruck. He is not an A grade first rate ruck. We have both smith and Stanley who are equal if not better slightly than Lycett. So would pass.
Kelly is of much higher value given his first year form that lycett
If I was list manager....
I would be looking at trading our 2019 first for a late first rounder this year and hopefully a second. Get those three draft picks (incl. pick 6 or whatever it will be) in early next year, let them all play together with Darcy, Brayshaw and Cerra etc. Something that got me thinking on the weekend was how much we lack continuity this year, each week there's a new ruckman palming it down to you, and you have no idea who the bloke it is you're kicking it to in the forward line. Another aspect of it is looking at St Kilda. They traded out of 2016 to get two 2017 picks. Everyone thought they made out like Bandits in the O'Meara trade however they barely had any talent to get on the field in 2017 and have essentially delayed their rebuild. My belief is a lot of gun players come from that 10-20 pick bracket (Dangerfield, Fyfe) and loading up on picks there is definitely worth looking at.
Is that "bringing them home" thread still kicking around?
No doubt Bondy et al are keeping a close eye on the following and will sound out a return home (whether they're worth it or not is besides the point).
- Tim Kelly
- Blake Acres
- Darcy Cameron
- Shai Bolton
- Matt Guelfi
- Brandon Starcevich
- Sam Taylor
- Billy Frampton
- Rory Lobb
- Zac Fisher
- Quentin Narkle
Wish we had picked up this kid.
Yeah I wished we had picked up Acres.Wish we had picked up this kid.
Yeah I wished we had picked up Acres.
That's a bit rood.As long as we don't go so silly as to give a hectare for an acre.