- Oct 31, 2016
- 2,386
- 1,613
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Other Teams
- qpr
Maybe we need Bedford so much in part because we are potentially playing one more tall than is ideal. Maybe that is ok vs saints though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think he just brings so much pressure that it increases our chance of being able to play the game in our terms.Maybe we need Bedford so much in part because we are potentially playing one more tall than is ideal. Maybe that is ok vs saints though
He’s going to walk out a free man as long he’s called Patrick BedfordDidn’t seem like a lot of arguments from the AFL council. 1 line ?
That’s not encouraging. That makes me think they are going to say “thanks for wasting our time, we were never changing it”
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
And so he should be!Bedford free to Play!! Woo hoo!!
Surely that's the strongest team we've had on the field all yearOk, so:
Idun Taylor HH
Ash Buckley Whitfield
Callaghan Cogs Kelly
Greene Ricca Brown
Daniels Hogan Snooze
Briggs Ward Green
Perryman Lloyd Cumming Keeffe
Sub: Haynes
If Callaghan isn’t fit then Angwin or XOH comes in.
It'd be close for sure. Callaghan probably the only real omission and he's a chance.Surely that's the strongest team we've had on the field all year
Fin was in the team postedIt'd be close for sure. Callaghan probably the only real omission and he's a chance.
they finally realised it was a different Toby and apologised profusely for the confusion and reversed the decision.Toby Bedford AFL Appeal Board tribunal currently taking place - live report link:
Giants’ appeal over ‘unreasonable’ call pays off as Toby Bedford cleared after 11-day saga
‘F*** yes!’: Giants gun’s priceless reaction as successful appeal ends 11-day finals sagawww.foxsports.com.au
The part that would have helped most was all the people saying if this was a big club etc... double standards make the AFL look bad.obviously all the negative press led someone to phone in a result here ...but the right result was reached at last