the curse of #36 strikes again

Remove this Banner Ad

A while ago i suggested giving this number to a rookie pick, because then there is not much to lose if the 'curse' strikes. A case of great minds thinking alike maybe?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

In the last 40 odd years, only one player has played more than 10 games wearing #36.

Barry Young ran out (or hobbled out) 13 times in season 2000. Gene Chiron appeared in #36 for 33 matches from 1968 to 1972. Then you go back to the late 1950's (1956-1960) when Brian Falconer appeared in 57 matches wearing #36. Finally, Wally Nash wore #36 for 12 matches in season 1954.

That is four players that have worn #36 in 10 matches or more. Four !
 
In the last 40 odd years, only one player has played more than 10 games wearing #36.

Barry Young ran out (or hobbled out) 13 times in season 2000. Gene Chiron appeared in #36 for 33 matches from 1968 to 1972. Then you go back to the late 1950's (1956-1960) when Brian Falconer appeared in 57 matches wearing #36. Finally, Wally Nash wore #36 for 12 matches in season 1954.

That is four players that have worn #36 in 10 matches or more. Four !

Isn't that the number of ACLs we have had in the number as well?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Number 1 is dedicated to the fans?

Yes, I know, and I've never liked that idea. If I were someone like Ray Jencke who wore the number for 188 games, I'd want to see my number being paraded on the ground, not just tossed aside and forgotten. Seems strange to retire a number for the hell of it.

How many fans do we see wearing the number 1 on their jumpers?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top