- Mar 28, 2018
- 10,491
- 8,454
- AFL Club
- GWS
We'll have agree to disagree on that. I get footy fans would travel, and would probably fill the ground. ANZ and the SCG have members rights similar to the MCG though. The difference being they wouldn't be footy fans. A lot of people who weren't would go for the spectacle as well, and be advantaged in not having to travel.Mate my reference to GWS's long term prospects apply to all non vic clubs - it was not a dig at your club.
Yes you can only play at the ground you are playing on and I don't think for one minute players & coaches would look at it any other way. However it is clear home ground (state) advantage is clearly a thing - so much so the AFL changed its rules in regard to all finals except the GF after the Brisbane home preliminary final at the MCG in 2004. Also if clubs had the chance to have the GF played at their ground your kidding yourself they wouldn't jump at it no matter how much they might tow the company line in public.
Your really think a Sydney GF would be full of non interested rugby league types? Not a chance. Last year thousands upon thousands of Adelaide supporters missed out on GF tickets on top of completely filled allocation the support base received. There isn't a stadium in the country that wouldn't be filled with AFL club fans on GF day - in fact you might find more get to go than currently.
I get that you would like to see your side win a flag at the "home of football" and I honestly think you will. However if your side is handicapped almost every time it has a chance to win the flag regardless of whether it has earn't the higher seeding simply because of a tradition that made sense in a state league competition it questions the integrity of the competition.
At the 2016 PF at Spotless, through some wierd contractual arrangement, ANZ members had an allocation of tkts at Spotless. They weren't even fully subscribed.