- Sep 7, 2015
- 15,717
- 36,254
- AFL Club
- Tasmania
Straight swap for Bailey Williams who was in AA form in the last three rounds of 2017
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Straight swap for Bailey Williams who was in AA form in the last three rounds of 2017
Have been advised the Dogs approached Dougal Howard’s management with a 4 year deal. Port livid about it and aren’t entertaining offers for him.
It must be true, if you say so .So he is gone.
Thanks for clearing it up.
2020 R1(2-10)?
Why would you be advised?
He’s just repeating a post from the Dogs’ board from a few days ago, almost verbatim. Can’t believe he’s used the word ‘advised’. Very funny.
1st round pick should get it done once he requests a trade
This is what I don't get about these people who claim to have inside sources. Why bother sharing it with strangers on the internet, and potentially risk getting their supposed source into trouble, or risk getting themselves cut off from the info. Keep that s**t to yourself if you hear anything. Anyone who shares insider crap on BF is 99% of the time absolutely lyingSo why would go on a public forum and out him as a potential source?
My favourite was Majak Daw apparently hasn't shown anything at AFL level as a defender...
Apart from an entire year of very good games in his 1 year there, but ok.
You mean you're a liar and took the info I shared with your board and manufactured it into you knowing someone at the club? Poor form.I know someone in the Club.
So you reckon the noise about Dougal stemmed from the Dogs making an approach?
D4C is one of about only 3 "ITK's" who I have found to have good info in my however many years on bigfooty
So you reckon the noise about Dougal stemmed from the Dogs making an approach?
No doubt. I'd suggest clubs ask about anyone remotely useful to them and receive 'no' as an answer for most of them.So you reckon the noise about Dougal stemmed from the Dogs making an approach?
No doubt. I'd suggest clubs ask about anyone remotely useful to them and receive 'no' as an answer for most of them.
I'd imagine the conversation went:
Bulldogs: Hi Port, we like Dougal. Would you consider a trade?
Port: Not at all, he's contracted and we rate him.
Bulldogs: Ok, thanks for your time.
Queue months of BigFooty rumours.
Yep it's a clear area of need for us at both ends. If our club weren't asking the question about KPPs at every club we'd be shooting ourselves in the foot, especially now that player contracts tend to be less iron-clad than they used to be.I remember earlier in the year having a squiz at your board for some reason and someone your board held in some regard mentioned the dogs had asked the question of Todd Marshall and he said thanks but I’m keen to stay where I am thanks
The poster mentioned the dogs had been doing the rounds to a number of kpp to see if there was any interest.