Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought Sweet and particularly West were great contributors, not sure how you could say they weren'tBig call. Maybe Williams and Cleary.
Happy with the 4 points and squaring the ledger. Act II begins
I don't see a long term spot in the sure for him once Bruce is healthy and capable of being a chop out. But his work in the contest and tackling is enough for me at this stage.That’s not actually true through. Witts is reasonable once the ruck contest is fought and gets his hands dirty. He also gets decent disposal numbers for a ruck.
Not the Gawn type marking option, but when you pull in 50+ taps most weeks, you can be forgiven.
Like I said, Swee needs more strings to his bow to find a long term role in our side. That’s just how our teams make up works. Even more so now that English has stepped up.
If it was up to me, now that Sweet has made progress, I’d play him as No 1 and English number two. Until we bring someone else in. That’s not going to happen though.
There's room for all 3. Scott/McComb could go out to make room. McNeil has been playing wing and West is very capable further up. Both ahead of VDM nowAlso, I thought today was the best our forward line functioned all year.
McNeil or West when Weightman comes back?
I don't think I said that. Are they best 22? I don't think so. Did they contribute meaningfully today? For the most part. I would have selected them both today and been happy enough with their performances. But they'll both be squeezed, IMO, if/when the cavalry arrive (English, Bruce, Hunter, Weightman, McLean, JJ, VDM(?), Duryea, Hannan).I thought Sweet and particularly West were great contributors, not sure how you could say they weren't
Richards is a star
Yeah he was very good, stats wise obviously didn’t do much but I really think it shows how dominant our midfield can be with a proper ruck in there. It’s not even what we get from Sweet though for me, I really think it takes English to a new level just letting him focus on doing what he does best - why waste him grinding around the ground which is not his strong suit when we can use him to his strengths, sit him behind the bal ahead of the ball, up at the contest whatever, but don’t waste him in the ruck contest.I don't disagree tbh. Was very impressed with Sweet's effort today. Got unlucky with a few umpire calls.
I don't see a long term spot in the sure for him once Bruce is healthy and capable of being a chop out. But his work in the contest and tackling is enough for me at this stage.
I don't see much point of a ruck getting cheap uncontested possessions when it's almost always better in the hands of any other player on the field. As long as he isn't allowing his opponent to take contested grabs down the line and he's nailing tackles in the contest then he's doing fine.
Just hope they keep him above Martin in the pecking order and above Cordy as 2nd ruck
I think DWs observation is about the mark. No point exhausting Timmy when he gets back so Sweet likely plays next week and possibly the week after....then the bye. Who knows how it goes after that.This board will be a very interesting place if sweet gets dropped for english
Tim English gives this the thumbs down. Makes perfect sense though.Our first priority should always be to give our mids the best opportunity to dominate the game. And with the 6-6-6 rule centre clearances are more important than ever.
For me thats picking 2 rucks to make sure at all times we negate (as much as possible) any ability for opposition rucks to dominate.
50/50 spilt for English/Sweet.
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
One reason might be that he WANTS to be the #1 ruck … and even hinted he might leave if he wasn’t given that role.Yeah he was very good, stats wise obviously didn’t do much but I really think it shows how dominant our midfield can be with a proper ruck in there. It’s not even what we get from Sweet though for me, I really think it takes English to a new level just letting him focus on doing what he does best - why waste him grinding around the ground which is not his strong suit when we can use him to his strengths, sit him behind the bal ahead of the ball, up at the contest whatever, but don’t waste him in the ruck contest.
And all we lose is the run of a very very average runner like a Scott, McComb whoever, I don’t think it’s a big loss personally
We should have absolutely belted them, never should have been that close. Unfortunately we just keep on doing it to ourselves by being incapable of converting. I mean it didn't help that the umpires picked out three holding frees against us in three separate inside 50s in a row and the Suns were just fluking goals out of nowhere.
I actually thought Sweet was pretty good in terms of ground level effort. Zaine is more agile sure but he’s not exactly racking up touches. Would definitely prefer Sweet as second ruck.Surely Sweet can play the 2nd ruck/ forward role better than Cordy? Cordy had 3 disposals and 1 mark. What would we gain playing him in that role over Sweet?