LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
That second serve lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not wrong though.Oh rafa could definitely get to it and even surpass it. But the h2h is biased with many losses coming on clay, but it's a debate done to death. The poster stated that novak and rafa will be known as greater once they are retired. Simply wrong.
It was always going to be unfair to someone. The linesman shat the bed. It wasnt even close, nor was it "needed".
I have never been a linesman, never will be. So this is very much as an "expert" talking absolute crap. But surely if there was any doubt there, any at all, you stay silent. I get it, you call it how you see it, and i am talking crap but Kei was going to win the point so why yell out.
If djokovic wins 7 grand slam titles post the age of 31, that would be the most ever won by a player after that age. Sure, it's technically possible. List of things are possible. Doesn't mean it will happen.It's not wrong though.
It could conceivably happen.
I've literally just explained how it could. If they chase down his 20 and have superior h2h they could well be considered greater when it's all done.
Wimbledon has got it right. 12-all. It prevents the crazy Isner matches but keeps the tradition of how you meant to finish an epic match(etc winning games). Keeps it fairI'd say if the game score gets to 10-10 or something in the 5th, then go to a super. Rarely do games get that far anyway.
Yeah. Wouldnt want to be them. I always sit on the baseline when I am watching tennis matches live, and i always get the calls wrong.It's a hard job to do, highly prone to error.
If djokovic wins 7 grand slam titles post the age of 31, that would be the most ever won by a player after that age. Sure, it's technically possible. List of things are possible. Doesn't mean it will happen.
Once again the poster stated that at the end of their careers, Novak and rafa will be known as much greater than Federer. I stand by the statement that that is an atrocious call.
He only needs 6.If djokovic wins 7 grand slam titles post the age of 31, that would be the most ever won by a player after that age. Sure, it's technically possible. List of things are possible. Doesn't mean it will happen.
Once again the poster stated that at the end of their careers, Novak and rafa will be known as much greater than Federer. I stand by the statement that that is an atrocious call.
They can claim to be much greater if they get to 21 slams?If they have more grand slam titles than him then they have a good claim to be
records like total weeks/consecutive weeks at world number 1 means nothing
Go back and show us where he said much greater.They can claim to be much greater if they get to 21 slams?
"Nadal and Novak will well and truly be known as the best when they are done"Go back and show us where he said much greater.
Reckon Wimbledon have it right, tie break at 12-12. But no Tilley and the AO need to be different and introduce what really is a crap way to decide it. Hopefully sh!t like this comes back to bite the administration.I'd say if the game score gets to 10-10 or something in the 5th, then go to a super. Rarely do games get that far anyway.
Fed fanbois last 10 years "Grand Slam titles is everything h2h doesnt matter he's the greatest."If they have more grand slam titles than him then they have a good claim to be
records like total weeks/consecutive weeks at world number 1 means nothing
He needs 7 to go past Federer.He only needs 6.
And he said they will be known as the best. It could happen, almost certainly should for Rafa.
So he didnt say much greater."Nadal and Novak will well and truly be known as the best when they are done"