On the own. You are correct. Its the other components of the deal that will make it a win or lose. This is not the draft to load up onPlease dear god don't even THINK about using pick 19 for ablett or watts... Neither is worth that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On the own. You are correct. Its the other components of the deal that will make it a win or lose. This is not the draft to load up onPlease dear god don't even THINK about using pick 19 for ablett or watts... Neither is worth that.
56 is no good to GC they wont pick that deep and they will want to get in 2018 picks not trade them out. If they get reasonable my guess is they ask for something like 19 and our 2nd rnd 2018 for Ablett 25 and 36/39 something along those lines maybe.
.
Coffield won't last until 20 higgins despite recruiters height discrimination should go round 1 like gresham. Petrucelle might be an option and i would like lochie obrien if he slides.
Hall’s defensive work is non-existence
He’s a downhill skier...do not want
I know it sounds off ... but in a way the Tippet thing marries up with a Salary dump concept... you are basically paying another club to take the contract off you......
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...m/news-story/dfa07186569fc617de7f5a893858a48d
The idea is common in the NBA. In 2011 the LA Clippers sent a washed-up Baron Davis’s $13 million contract and an unprotected future pick — ultimately No.1 (Kyrie Irving) — to Cleveland for a pair of players.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...m/news-story/dfa07186569fc617de7f5a893858a48d
If compare that nba trade to the afl and Tippet for example . The Swans trade Tippet and their first R1 pick to Gold Coast for one or two throw away players....
Hall’s defensive work is non-existence
He’s a downhill skier...do not want
O'Brien is my choice as well. Should go around the late teen mark. Don't mind Richards either.Coffield won't last until 20 higgins despite recruiters height discrimination should go round 1 like gresham. Petrucelle might be an option and i would like lochie obrien if he slides.
For mine you make a great point
Usually i would agree... but this is not the draft to load up on. Will we get a better player than hall, watts or Stringer at pick 20? I very much doubt itThere are an abundance of players I don't want either..in the end it will mean zip. I do think if the club can find a way to replace the type of contributions Motlop gave ...they will. If it was up to me Id just be going to the draft.
See if some club will take our this year picks for next year's. I doubt it but a gal can try.Usually i would agree... but this is not the draft to load up on. Will we get a better player than hall, watts or Stringer at pick 20? I very much doubt it
Dangerfield, J.Selwood, Ablett, Parfitt, Menegola, Guthrie, Horlin-Smith. We're stacked. Inside mids aren't our issue.
Another reason to trade out of the early pics is the type of players we need to take are generally found late anyway. For example small forward, developing key defender and developing ruck.
With Grundy a year or two from retirement the Swans wont be moving AlirThurlow struggles to get a game with Geelong. Same same. Plenty of thurlows out there. Alir is athletic, strong & with plenty of upside as well. A lot harder to find ply like him. May well fail, but worth a shot
This is why I would be asking about Schache for a 35 as it is now. Pick up a quality KPF for a bargainWe need a key forward but we will need to trade one in as you cant usually get ones of any quality with the sort of picks we have.
I agree that small forwards and defenders you can get with late picks (we dont need a ruck).
This is why I would be asking about Schache for a 35 as it is now. Pick up a quality KPF for a bargain
Fair point and agree 100%There are an abundance of players I don't want either..in the end it will mean zip. I do think if the club can find a way to replace the type of contributions Motlop gave ...they will. If it was up to me Id just be going to the draft.
P*ssing myself laughing @ that proposed trade.So Ablett and Hall for P19... Its not horrible... and Hall would in some part make up for the loss of Motlop
If we want schache we will be parting with pick 19 minimum. We can dream thoughThis is why I would be asking about Schache for a 35 as it is now. Pick up a quality KPF for a bargain
I really hope that when he retires he writes a book, would love to explore his insights and how he views and thinks about footy related things.You're more likely to win the lottery than predict Wells' picks.
Worth exploring haven’t considered that angle actually.I think Hawthorn could be the key here by offering up their 1st round pick in 2018 to one of GCS or Essendon. They could get overs for it considering how desperate these two teams are to offload those picks in the 20's.
Pure... the whole point of that is that they will not use it... they probably will not use 36 and 38. As I said this would go in some way to uniting both clubs in making it happen and both could walk away saying they gave to make it happen. So taking a pick like 56 is no different than us taking P80 what ever..for Chappy
19 and our R2 2018 (range 28-36) ... for Ablett 25 and 36 .. well lets just see I guess. If they will not trade their 2018..I see no reason for us to.
Atpit ... Gold Coast have a huge opportunity to show all that although they can be tough , they can also be a place that takes care of their players.
I think Hawthorn could be the key here by offering up their 1st round pick in 2018 to one of GCS or Essendon. They could get overs for it considering how desperate these two teams are to offload those picks in the 20's.