Jaiyden Stephenson anyone?
He's an amazing player and I'd take him. But do we need him?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jaiyden Stephenson anyone?
Who are you referring to?Worst game I’ve seen him play all year to be honest. Won’t change my mind though.... Gun in the making. But I have a feeling he’ll be heading the Dockers way if my intel is correct.
On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app
Worst game I’ve seen him play all year to be honest. Won’t change my mind though.... Gun in the making. But I have a feeling he’ll be heading the Dockers way if my intel is correct.
On iPad using BigFooty.com mobile app
YepWho? Bolton ?
Remember being linked to DeGoey too but he was a late riser up the board.
I actually reckon our trade to get the higher pick was with De Goey in mind as there were stong links pre draft and he would have been the ideal candidate as a future Bartel replacement but he rose up way too far late in the piece. One of those ones where you would love to know why Wells really did it, could have used trading on the draft night back then.
I would love Adam Saad but from what I was told yesterday he is going to nominate Carlton if he leaves Essendon.
He's an amazing player and I'd take him. But do we need him?
Yeah I don’t see the value in stephenson. Plays like an undersized explosive full forward and when he plays up the field has zero impact, hardly touches it which screams really low footy iq to me. To be blunt, he ain’t the bravest player I’ve seen either.He's an amazing player and I'd take him. But do we need him?
I would love Adam Saad but from what I was told yesterday he is going to nominate Carlton if he leaves Essendon.
Well I actually heard Richmond. Not sure where though.That's weird, I read he was looking to go somewhere for success?
I agree, I think he has massive upside. Before his suspension he was pretty damaging iirc.He's an amazing player and I'd take him. But do we need him?
He's not bad but benefits greatly from being paid zero attention. You put most players 3m off the contest with no one around them and have other mids win the contest for them they'll look just as good.I don't watch a lot of Richmond games, but against us on Friday night he was repeatedly caught & done for holding the ball - think it was like 3 times in the first quarter and at least once more in the second quarter (he ended up with 5 frees against)
I'm sure he's had better games, but watching him Friday night that didn't seem as impressive as his teammates
I would love Adam Saad but from what I was told yesterday he is going to nominate Carlton if he leaves Essendon.
Saad’s role has often changed significantly in defence from week to week in the back half of the year, varying between lock-down defence and a more offensive role.
Ideally he would like to be settled down into a role with a strong defensive mindset but that allows him to maximise his line-breaking abilities.
Definitely agree that I see Clark in a very similar fashion to Saad.If there is one thing we dont need its antoher defender. Still got clark to come back into tge team as the line breaking defender. Bews also doing a reasonable job this year.
we need a hawkins replacement. A ruck. An offensive half foward flanker
hi all, didn't want to start a new thread so thought i would put it within this one... and apologies if its already been addressed.
i read yesterday that the talk was going to be a squads of 38+2 rookies (unconfirmed) - and hopefully wrong.
Geelong currently has 46 listed players incl rookies.
They own 3 first round picks and a second round pick.
IF we manage to land Brad Crouch + one other FA (Cameron, Viney etc) or even another player via trade (bruest etc) our list would need a major cull??
46 players would need to become
40 (drop 6 just to fit the new AFL guideline)
36 (drop 4 more to fit 3 x 1st round picks 1x 2nd round pick)
34 (drop 2 more to fit in FA)
that is 12 gone from the current list (25% of the list)
beside Gaz, Taylor, Henderson, Nakai (probably) theres still another 8 that would need to get the chop.
seems like a huge amount ... or have i completely misunderstood this...
Looking more like 40+2+2. So it's not too extreme. We have enough deadwood to cut.hi all, didn't want to start a new thread so thought i would put it within this one... and apologies if its already been addressed.
i read yesterday that the talk was going to be a squads of 38+2 rookies (unconfirmed) - and hopefully wrong.
Geelong currently has 46 listed players incl rookies.
They own 3 first round picks and a second round pick.
IF we manage to land Brad Crouch + one other FA (Cameron, Viney etc) or even another player via trade (bruest etc) our list would need a major cull??
46 players would need to become
40 (drop 6 just to fit the new AFL guideline)
36 (drop 4 more to fit 3 x 1st round picks 1x 2nd round pick)
34 (drop 2 more to fit in FA)
that is 12 gone from the current list (25% of the list)
beside Gaz, Taylor, Henderson, Nakai (probably) theres still another 8 that would need to get the chop.
seems like a huge amount ... or have i completely misunderstood this...
SEN reakons we are into Luke Brust....even at 30 YO he will still kick 35 plus very good player and forward.
Well I actually heard Richmond. Not sure where though.