Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds like a dog I don’t want then.
(And I love dogs)
Can you see Bowes being in our best 22 next year?Yeah it’s an interesting case
Someone was saying the other day rules have changed and they could trade Bowes and 7 but not get anything in return.
Can’t say I’ve ever seen that tbh
If they have come to the decision that they are better off getting his $$$ off the books... They really can't reject anything.Yep but if bowes picks say us then they have to either deal for a future 1st thats probably in the teens or keep him. The danger with trying to push him out is that he might pick a club that doesnt have the currency they want.
Kid is an elite kick, absolutelyCan you see Bowes being in our best 22 next year?
Bowes is a two way running mid with excellent foot skills. He will complement the midfielders that are already at Geelong. Has the ability to play all over the ground which will appeal to Chris Scott’s ‘total football’ philosophy. Would be in our best 22 next year.Kid is an elite kick, absolutely
I can’t see him as a mid though
I see him as a Brad Sheppard backman who can play a lot taller than a KPD
The other part of it though, is that this is still a player trade. Bowes still gets to choose. Gcs can try tempt those clubs, those clubs in turn have to sell themselves to BowesSurely the pick 7 is to tempt a team like Hawforn, Norf or Essendon to give up next year’s R1 which has a good chance of being a top 5 selection.
I don't even really care about pick 7. I just want the controversyBigfooty would melt hard if we win the flag and get pick 7
Let alone the other players such as Henry and Brunh
What a time to be alive
It sounds like he has Degoey level cash owing to him for 2 years for a vfl player and won't extend at the Suns. They're stuckIt’s hard for me to fathom how pick 7 is needed if it’s just a salary dump. Seems like they see an opportunity to position themselves.
I don't think either will offer their future first for that very reason. That's why we might win Steven Bradbury style.Surely the pick 7 is to tempt a team like Hawforn, Norf or Essendon to give up next year’s R1 which has a good chance of being a top 5 selection.
And pick 7Imagine we win today.
Higgins, Dahl, Smith, Selwood, SavRat, Narkle, Menagola go..
Henry, O’Connor, Bruhn, Bowes, Clark, Clohesy come in.
The above poster has used pick 7 to get Clark in the draft.And pick 7
Oh the sweet melts and raging will be entertaining for the next few months
Didn’t see thatThe above poster has used pick 7 to get Clark in the draft.
SavRat will be our CHB/FB going ahead... We have zero options with key defenders if someone goes down.Imagine we win today.
Higgins, Dahl, Smith, Selwood, SavRat, Narkle, Menagola go..
Henry, O’Connor, Bruhn, Bowes, Clark, Clohesy come in.
Probs meant Connor Mckenna.SavRat will be our CHB/FB going ahead... We have zero options with key defenders if someone goes down.
and Who's O'Connor?
That's where the system is heading.This seems ludicrous. For Gold Coast to include pick 7 Bowes must currently be on $1.5m per year.
Does anyone else find it unbelievable that a mediocre team is potentially dumping a salary on the best team in the comp? This is not how the system is supposed to work. The crazy salary floor imposed on teams has a lot to answer for.
Imagine we win today.
Higgins, Dahl, Smith, Selwood, SavRat, Narkle, Menagola go..
Henry, O’Connor, Bruhn, Bowes, Clark, Clohesy come in.
Imagine we win today.
Higgins, Dahl, Smith, Selwood, SavRat, Narkle, Menagola go..
Henry, O’Connor, Bruhn, Bowes, Clark, Clohesy come in.
Are we doing this again?The above poster has used pick 7 to get Clark in the draft.
We should trade Menengola for ClarkAre we doing this again?
It's Clarke
Menegola will play on.Smith will play on imo.
Rest could happen.
The annoying thing about anything Clarke/Clark is my best mate is named Jordan Clarke or Clark... I never remember because The Jordan Clarke/Clark we had was different and has wrecked me forever in terms of Clark v Clarke.Are we doing this again?
It's Clarke
Surely we’re not doing this again.Are we doing this again?
It's Clarke
Genuine question - this year's Clark/e has an 'e' on the end?Are we doing this again?
It's Clarke