The third umpire should have used snicko. It was hardly conclusive that he hit it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://www.metservice.com/towns-cities/christchurch/christchurchanyone know the weather forecast? likely hood of rain?
I am never confident in run chases. So it is good I am playing golf in an hour. Total blackout planned for the next 5hrs!Lets get this done without any anxiety for all us here. Be great if Burns and Khawaja can get us home.
I'll be nervously following it on cricinfo. Pity I can't be on the couch watching it.I am never confident in run chases. So it is good I am playing golf in an hour. Total blackout planned for the next 5hrs!
I'm sick of these people griping at the Australians. I don't care if Kohli and so many players get into the grills, sledge and all that stuff. It's professional sport at the highest level and we are treating them like they can't do anything.
Yeah Hazlewood did wrong but the amount of issues by people like Harsha Bhogle and jornos who don't play professional sport irk me.
Nothing you say makes any sense, and is totally irrelevant. You obviously are just one of those trolls. Get off the drugs man.Nope, just nothing that is applicable to your double digit IQ
Right now, quick turn on the tv.How long till it starts?
The third umpire should have used snicko. It was hardly conclusive that he hit it
Been extremely disappointed with the NZ bowling over these five tests. Was supposed to be their strength but have shown next to nothing outside of the bowling dominated Adelaide day nighter.
Wagner's got tape on his bowling hand, any chance of a bowler getting an advantage from that?
Seems like he's going to be bowling bouncers all day.
and he's still out there. keep goin JoeyBurns has 2 in a 40 run partnership.
NZ have taken 2 wickets between the 20th and 80th overs, they have lost 22 in that same period.
no it wasn'tNah it was 100% conclusive.
It was 100% conclusive that there was a secondary effect capable of causing white marks on hotspot.Nah it was 100% conclusive.
no it wasn't
It was 100% conclusive that there was a secondary effect capable of causing white marks on hotspot.
Have a look at the front on replay. At all times it clearly shows a gap between bat and foot, especially as the ball goes through to hit the pad. Bat is a few inches off the ground. It was pretty clearly ball hitting bat.