- May 28, 2013
- 25,652
- 27,723
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Seattle Seahawks
So what’s your advice to the ess posters that posted in that thread? Maybe you should jump in that thread and post the same thing?But again, we end up back here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
So what’s your advice to the ess posters that posted in that thread? Maybe you should jump in that thread and post the same thing?But again, we end up back here
So what’s your advice to the ess posters that posted in that thread? Maybe you should jump in that thread and post the same thing?
Callum Coleman-JonesOkay. What will you give us?
What a piece of s**t reporting. “All time trade blunder”
It’s a pick that won’t be used anyway. And what’s the difference between Essendon knocking it back and Hawthorn offering it. Clearly neither knew the rules.
But there is a potential reason that Hawthorn made the offer - to avoid him becoming a FA for life.
What were the reasons for Essendon to decline the offer?
Also if the trade goes through now, he becomes a Hawthorn player now. Otherwise has to wait until the end of October to be delisted, and then wait for the delisted free agent signing period.But there is a potential reason that Hawthorn made the offer - to avoid him becoming a FA for life.
What were the reasons for Essendon to decline the offer?
So we are giving up both BZT and D'Ambrosio for Duursma.We’ll take 63 to shut Port up. It would be their first pick in the draft.
We're losing Mass for nothing. 63 would be irrelevant to us but worth something to Port.So we are giving up BZT and D'Ambrosio for Duursma.
No way.
Oh OK let's give him away for nothing. Cool.We're losing Mass for nothing. 63 would be irrelevant to us but worth something to Port.
... Like we're doing anyway? Like the Hawks won't offer more than that (fair enough) and therefore he'll become a DFA and we lose him for nothing.Oh OK let's give him away for nothing. Cool.
Too old and can't kick anyway.
Duursma was a first rounder and has potential to be a star.So we are giving up both BZT and D'Ambrosio for Duursma.
No way.
Duursma is fringe 22 at a team that went out in straight sets, and got shown up as soft in two finals.Duursma was a first rounder and has potential to be a star.
BZT won the reverse coleman and Massimo is a mid-season draft player who'll likely spend 80% of 2024 at Box Hill.
On what planet is that a bad outcome for Essendon?
Duursma had one good year.Duursma was a first rounder and has potential to be a star.
BZT won the reverse coleman and Massimo is a mid-season draft player who'll likely spend 80% of 2024 at Box Hill.
On what planet is that a bad outcome for Essendon?
Eh. Don't really care.I don't think a trade/deal will get done tbh.
Being best 22 in a mediocre Essendon side is hardly something to hang your hat on.Duursma is fringe 22 at a team that went out in straight sets, and got shown up as soft in two finals.
Zerk-Thatcher is a best 22 key defender that Port offered a four year deal to.
Now it's a meaningless pick for Mass but Zerk is definitely equal to Duursma in terms of value purely due to contract status.
So we get screwed.... Like we're doing anyway? Like the Hawks won't offer more than that (fair enough) and therefore he'll become a DFA and we lose him for nothing.
Eh. We have no bargaining power.So we get screwed.